Long-term atogepant for treatment-resistant migraine in real-world clinical practice: 12-month results (gema project)

Abstract Background Short- and mid-term real-world data support the effectiveness of atogepant for migraine prevention, but evidence beyond 6 months remains scarce. This study evaluated the 12-month effectiveness, safety, persistence, and predictors of response in a large treatment-resistant migraine cohort. Methods This prospective multicentre study enrolled patients from 15 tertiary Headache Units in Spain within the GEMA Project. Clinical and demographic characteristics, previous and concomitant preventive treatments, monthly headache days (MHD), monthly migraine days (MMD), and adverse events were systematically collected at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. In a subset of patients, Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) were also assessed. Results A total of 513 patients were included. The cohort showed marked treatment resistance, with a median of 6 previous preventive failures; 74% ( n = 380) had chronic migraine, 84% ( n = 423) had previously failed onabotulinumtoxinA, and more than half had prior exposure to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies ( n = 270). Treatment persistence was approximately 80% at 6 months ( n = 409) and 60% at 12 months ( n = 304), with lack of effectiveness as the main reason for discontinuation. Among patients remaining on treatment with complete data at all follow-up visits, median MHD decreased from 20 days at baseline to 10 days at 3 months and 9 days at 6 months, remaining stable at 9 days at 12 months. Median MMD decreased from 13 days to 6 days at 3 months, 5 days at 6 months, and remained at 5 days at 12 months ( p < 0.0001 versus baseline for all time points). At 12 months, ≥ 50% response rates were 52.3% for MHD and 57.8% for MMD in the observed-case analysis, and approximately 31% and 33%, respectively, using non-responder imputation in the full baseline cohort. Improvements in disability and medication overuse were observed, while exploratory analyses in smaller subsets suggested improvements in anxiety, depression, and insomnia. A greater burden of previous preventive treatment failures independently predicted lower odds of achieving a ≥ 50% response at 12 months. The frequency of most reported adverse events was lower at later follow-up visits, and no new safety signals emerged. Conclusions Atogepant was associated with maintained clinical benefit over 12 months among patients who remained on treatment, with a favourable long-term safety profile in a highly treatment-resistant migraine population. Greater previous preventive failure burden predicted lower response rates, reinforcing the importance of earlier preventive optimisation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07699549, retrospectively registered on 8th of July 2026.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-026-02509-6
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Long-term atogepant for treatment-resistant migraine in real-world clinical practice: 12-month results (gema project)

Elena Riva, Sarai Urtiaga, Yésica González‐Osorio, Guillermo Martín-Ávila et al.
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Migraine and Headache Studies
article

Long-term atogepant for treatment-resistant migraine in real-world clinical practice: 12-month results (gema project)

Elena Riva, Sarai Urtiaga, Yésica González‐Osorio, Guillermo Martín-Ávila, J. Porta‐Etessam, G. Latorre, Jaime Rodríguez-Vico, Alex Jaimes, N. González-García, Antonio Sánchez‐Soblechero, Javier Casas‐Limón, Marta Domínguez Gallego, Núria Montés, Ana Beatriz Gago‐Veiga, Ana Belén López-Rodríguez, María L. Cuadrado, Javier Díaz de Terán, Marta González Salaíces, Andrea Gómez García, Silvia Moreno Pulido, Carlos Calle de Miguel, Iris Fernández-Lázaro, Javier Camiña Muñiz, Leonardo Portocarrero-Sánchez, Alberto Lozano-Ros, Francisco-José Molina-Martínez, Alejandro Herrero San-Martin, Michele Dileone, Africa Garrido Jimena, Blanca Hoyas Cruz, Sonia Santos-Lasaosa, Ángel-Luis Guerrero-Peral
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Short- and mid-term real-world data support the effectiveness of atogepant for migraine prevention, but evidence beyond 6 months remains scarce. This study evaluated the 12-month effectiveness, safety, persistence, and predictors of response in a large treatment-resistant migraine cohort. Methods This prospective multicentre study enrolled patients from 15 tertiary Headache Units in Spain within the GEMA Project. Clinical and demographic characteristics, previous and concomitant preventive treatments, monthly headache days (MHD), monthly migraine days (MMD), and adverse events were systematically collected at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. In a subset of patients, Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) were also assessed. Results A total of 513 patients were included. The cohort showed marked treatment resistance, with a median of 6 previous preventive failures; 74% ( n = 380) had chronic migraine, 84% ( n = 423) had previously failed onabotulinumtoxinA, and more than half had prior exposure to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies ( n = 270). Treatment persistence was approximately 80% at 6 months ( n = 409) and 60% at 12 months ( n = 304), with lack of effectiveness as the main reason for discontinuation. Among patients remaining on treatment with complete data at all follow-up visits, median MHD decreased from 20 days at baseline to 10 days at 3 months and 9 days at 6 months, remaining stable at 9 days at 12 months. Median MMD decreased from 13 days to 6 days at 3 months, 5 days at 6 months, and remained at 5 days at 12 months ( p < 0.0001 versus baseline for all time points). At 12 months, ≥ 50% response rates were 52.3% for MHD and 57.8% for MMD in the observed-case analysis, and approximately 31% and 33%, respectively, using non-responder imputation in the full baseline cohort. Improvements in disability and medication overuse were observed, while exploratory analyses in smaller subsets suggested improvements in anxiety, depression, and insomnia. A greater burden of previous preventive treatment failures independently predicted lower odds of achieving a ≥ 50% response at 12 months. The frequency of most reported adverse events was lower at later follow-up visits, and no new safety signals emerged. Conclusions Atogepant was associated with maintained clinical benefit over 12 months among patients who remained on treatment, with a favourable long-term safety profile in a highly treatment-resistant migraine population. Greater previous preventive failure burden predicted lower response rates, reinforcing the importance of earlier preventive optimisation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07699549, retrospectively registered on 8th of July 2026.

The Journal of Headache and Pain
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Hospital Universitario de Torrejón (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón (ES), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Hospital Universitario de Getafe (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa (ES), Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada (ES), Hospital Ruber Internacional (ES), Hospital Universitario Son Espases (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (ES), Hospital Virgen del Puerto (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Migraine and Headache Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.