Determination of candidate predictors for chiropractic treatment outcome of spinal pain using a machine learning framework for small datasets

OBJECTIVES: To develop a machine learning (ML) approach to explore self-reported factors predictive for recovery in a small set of spinal pain patients. METHODS: = 96; mean age = 44.5 ± 16.5 years; 53 female) completed an extensive questionnaire at baseline and after 1 and 3 months. Prediction targets were defined as binary outcomes (recovery/non-recovery) based on improvement at 3 months for pain intensity, disability, quality of life, and Patient Global Impression of Change. The ML-approach included three steps: selection of candidate baseline features (SHapley Additive exPlanations, SHAP); predictor validation (Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation, LOOCV) and permutation testing; testing for the ability to generalize. RESULTS: Area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.93-0.99 in LOOCV and 0.62-0.90 in ensemble cross-validation (CV). SHAP analyses revealed higher recovery odds with positive treatment expectations and higher self-efficacy, younger age, lower body mass index, and fewer comorbidities. Psychological dysfunction generally hindered recovery. CONCLUSIONS: This explorative study suggests that the current ML framework may identify candidate predictors of chiropractic treatment outcome in spinal pain from a small but phenotypically rich dataset. Given the performance drop between LOOCV and ensemble CV, current findings are hypothesis-generating. Prospective replication in adequately powered cohorts is necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain Management
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2026.2718881
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Determination of candidate predictors for chiropractic treatment outcome of spinal pain using a machine learning framework for small datasets

Brigitte Wirth, Martina Wehrli, Petra Schweinhardt, Michael L. Meier et al.
Pain Management
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Determination of candidate predictors for chiropractic treatment outcome of spinal pain using a machine learning framework for small datasets

Brigitte Wirth, Martina Wehrli, Petra Schweinhardt, Michael L. Meier, Torsten Bergander, Valentin Hollenstein
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a machine learning (ML) approach to explore self-reported factors predictive for recovery in a small set of spinal pain patients. METHODS: = 96; mean age = 44.5 ± 16.5 years; 53 female) completed an extensive questionnaire at baseline and after 1 and 3 months. Prediction targets were defined as binary outcomes (recovery/non-recovery) based on improvement at 3 months for pain intensity, disability, quality of life, and Patient Global Impression of Change. The ML-approach included three steps: selection of candidate baseline features (SHapley Additive exPlanations, SHAP); predictor validation (Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation, LOOCV) and permutation testing; testing for the ability to generalize. RESULTS: Area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.93-0.99 in LOOCV and 0.62-0.90 in ensemble cross-validation (CV). SHAP analyses revealed higher recovery odds with positive treatment expectations and higher self-efficacy, younger age, lower body mass index, and fewer comorbidities. Psychological dysfunction generally hindered recovery. CONCLUSIONS: This explorative study suggests that the current ML framework may identify candidate predictors of chiropractic treatment outcome in spinal pain from a small but phenotypically rich dataset. Given the performance drop between LOOCV and ensemble CV, current findings are hypothesis-generating. Prospective replication in adequately powered cohorts is necessary.

Pain Management
University of Zurich (CH), Sig Holding (Switzerland) (CH), Universitätsklinik Balgrist (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.