Standard Intraoperative Fluid Practices During the 2024 Intravenous Fluid Shortage

Importance A nationwide intravenous fluid shortage in 2024 prompted hospitals to substantially reduce intraoperative crystalloid administration, creating a natural experiment to examine standard intraoperative fluid practices. The clinical consequences of such abrupt reductions in fluid use remain unclear. Objective To evaluate the associations among a marked reduction in intraoperative crystalloid administration, perioperative outcomes, and costs of care. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was conducted from September 2 to December 31, 2024, across a hospital network in the Bronx, New York, comprising adults undergoing surgery at 9 hospitals of different acuity levels. Exposure The exposure was the implementation of a hospital-wide intervention aimed at reducing intraoperative intravenous crystalloid administration. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes included change in intraoperative crystalloid administration. Additional outcomes included intraoperative hypotension, urine output, urinary catheter utilization, hospital readmissions, postoperative acute kidney injury, length of stay, and costs of care. Results A total of 38 976 patients (mean [SD], age 55.7 [19.8] years; 21 944 [56.3%] female), including 12 026 (30.9%) before and 26 950 (69.1%) during implementation of a fluid reduction bundle, were included in the study. The implementation of the fluid reduction bundle was associated with a 75.2% lower intraoperative crystalloid administration (adjusted exponentiated β coefficient [ e β ], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.24-0.26; P < .001). The intervention was associated with lower urine output (adjusted e β , 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96; P = .002), reduced urinary catheter utilization (adjusted relative risk [ARR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.92; P < .001), and fewer hospital readmissions (ARR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.89; P < .001). There were no meaningful differences in intraoperative hypotension (adjusted e β , 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; P = .07), postoperative acute kidney injury (ARR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.09; P = .58), or costs of care (adjusted e β , 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; P = .46). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study’s natural experiment, grossly reduced intraoperative crystalloid fluid administration was associated with lower urine output, reduced urinary catheter use, and fewer hospital readmissions, without worse patient-centered outcomes. These results challenge standard intraoperative fluid practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.34064
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Standard Intraoperative Fluid Practices During the 2024 Intravenous Fluid Shortage

Ibraheem M. Karaye, Michele C. Siciliano, Constance Rippel, Felix Borngaesser et al.
JAMA Network Open
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Standard Intraoperative Fluid Practices During the 2024 Intravenous Fluid Shortage

Ibraheem M. Karaye, Michele C. Siciliano, Constance Rippel, Felix Borngaesser, Karuna Wongtangman, Andrew D. Racine, Jeffrey M. Weiss, Peter Semczuk, Matthias Eikermann, Nicholas Kolmel, Rafi Khandaker, Noah Hopstein, Ali Bordbar Jahantighi, Lorenz Droege, Michael L. Rinke, Tomer Kotek, Aiman M. Suleiman, Mark Condoleo, Michael E. Kiyatkin, Dorothee S. Straetz, Adela M. Aguirre-Alarcon, Jason Hallick
article en

Abstract

Importance A nationwide intravenous fluid shortage in 2024 prompted hospitals to substantially reduce intraoperative crystalloid administration, creating a natural experiment to examine standard intraoperative fluid practices. The clinical consequences of such abrupt reductions in fluid use remain unclear. Objective To evaluate the associations among a marked reduction in intraoperative crystalloid administration, perioperative outcomes, and costs of care. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was conducted from September 2 to December 31, 2024, across a hospital network in the Bronx, New York, comprising adults undergoing surgery at 9 hospitals of different acuity levels. Exposure The exposure was the implementation of a hospital-wide intervention aimed at reducing intraoperative intravenous crystalloid administration. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes included change in intraoperative crystalloid administration. Additional outcomes included intraoperative hypotension, urine output, urinary catheter utilization, hospital readmissions, postoperative acute kidney injury, length of stay, and costs of care. Results A total of 38 976 patients (mean [SD], age 55.7 [19.8] years; 21 944 [56.3%] female), including 12 026 (30.9%) before and 26 950 (69.1%) during implementation of a fluid reduction bundle, were included in the study. The implementation of the fluid reduction bundle was associated with a 75.2% lower intraoperative crystalloid administration (adjusted exponentiated β coefficient [ e β ], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.24-0.26; P < .001). The intervention was associated with lower urine output (adjusted e β , 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96; P = .002), reduced urinary catheter utilization (adjusted relative risk [ARR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.92; P < .001), and fewer hospital readmissions (ARR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.89; P < .001). There were no meaningful differences in intraoperative hypotension (adjusted e β , 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; P = .07), postoperative acute kidney injury (ARR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.09; P = .58), or costs of care (adjusted e β , 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; P = .46). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study’s natural experiment, grossly reduced intraoperative crystalloid fluid administration was associated with lower urine output, reduced urinary catheter use, and fewer hospital readmissions, without worse patient-centered outcomes. These results challenge standard intraoperative fluid practices.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(9)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Klinikum Oldenburg (DE), Montefiore Health System (US), University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH), Children's Hospital at Montefiore (US), University Hospital Cologne (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.