Eliminating Equity: A Culture-Centered Reading of the Attack on Health Equity in Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership

's HHS chapter through the culture-centered approach (CCA), joining its account of structure, culture, agency, voice, and communicative inequality to a critical discourse analysis of the chapter's mission statement, its five governing goals, and its data provisions. The chapter does more than oppose equity policies. It reorganizes the conceptual and infrastructural conditions under which health inequity can be named, measured, and redressed. To describe that work the article develops communicative eliminationism: the administrative withdrawal of the categories that make the structural determinants of health visible to evidence, funding, and care. Five operations carry the withdrawal, recoding, un-naming, conditioning, displacing, and enumerating, and they reach three registers of increasing depth, from the recoding of a category through its administrative un-naming to the withdrawal of the infrastructure that sustains it. The chapter recodes equity as ideology, un-names disfavored forms of care, redistributes the power of refusal, installs a sacralized family form as a metric of health, and turns health surveillance from recognition toward monitoring. Read alongside the normative rationales its own authors offer, the chapter suspends each rationale exactly where it would protect the populations it names, and that asymmetry is the strongest evidence for the eliminationist reading. On culture-centered premises, defending health equity means protecting the infrastructures of recognition and organizing for structural transformation, not culturally sensitive communication inside categories that are being erased.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Communication
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2026.2734166
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Eliminating Equity: A Culture-Centered Reading of the Attack on Health Equity in Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership

Mohan J. Dutta
Health Communication
Community Health and Development
article

Eliminating Equity: A Culture-Centered Reading of the Attack on Health Equity in Project 2025’s Mandate for Leadership

Mohan J. Dutta
article en

Abstract

's HHS chapter through the culture-centered approach (CCA), joining its account of structure, culture, agency, voice, and communicative inequality to a critical discourse analysis of the chapter's mission statement, its five governing goals, and its data provisions. The chapter does more than oppose equity policies. It reorganizes the conceptual and infrastructural conditions under which health inequity can be named, measured, and redressed. To describe that work the article develops communicative eliminationism: the administrative withdrawal of the categories that make the structural determinants of health visible to evidence, funding, and care. Five operations carry the withdrawal, recoding, un-naming, conditioning, displacing, and enumerating, and they reach three registers of increasing depth, from the recoding of a category through its administrative un-naming to the withdrawal of the infrastructure that sustains it. The chapter recodes equity as ideology, un-names disfavored forms of care, redistributes the power of refusal, installs a sacralized family form as a metric of health, and turns health surveillance from recognition toward monitoring. Read alongside the normative rationales its own authors offer, the chapter suspends each rationale exactly where it would protect the populations it names, and that asymmetry is the strongest evidence for the eliminationist reading. On culture-centered premises, defending health equity means protecting the infrastructures of recognition and organizing for structural transformation, not culturally sensitive communication inside categories that are being erased.

Health Communication
Massey University (NZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.