A nationwide review of child safety restraint laws: Assessing uniformity to close gaps

Child car seat laws vary widely across U.S. states, creating potential safety risks for children and penalties for drivers during interstate travel. This study examined child restraint laws in all 50 states and the DC to assess their strength and uniformity. Statutes were collected using Nexis Uni and evaluated across seven parameters: rear-facing requirements, forward-facing requirements, booster-seat requirements, seat-belt requirements, fines for violations, license-point penalties, and enforcement type. Each parameter was scored on a 0–10 scale, with states meeting the stringent requirements receiving 10 points and others evaluated using secondary criteria. Results show substantial variation across states. Only Alabama, Alaska, Michigan, New Jersey, Washington, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia received B grades, indicating relatively strong laws. Four states received F grades and twelve received E grades, reflecting weak and less comprehensive child restraint laws. These findings highlight the need for stronger and more uniform child restraint laws nationwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transportation Safety & Security
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2026.2731976
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A nationwide review of child safety restraint laws: Assessing uniformity to close gaps

Praveena Penmetsa, Emmanuel Kofi Adanu, Abhay Lidbe, Salman Haider Khan et al.
Journal of Transportation Safety & Security
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

A nationwide review of child safety restraint laws: Assessing uniformity to close gaps

Praveena Penmetsa, Emmanuel Kofi Adanu, Abhay Lidbe, Salman Haider Khan, Steven Jones, Justin Fisher
article en

Abstract

Child car seat laws vary widely across U.S. states, creating potential safety risks for children and penalties for drivers during interstate travel. This study examined child restraint laws in all 50 states and the DC to assess their strength and uniformity. Statutes were collected using Nexis Uni and evaluated across seven parameters: rear-facing requirements, forward-facing requirements, booster-seat requirements, seat-belt requirements, fines for violations, license-point penalties, and enforcement type. Each parameter was scored on a 0–10 scale, with states meeting the stringent requirements receiving 10 points and others evaluated using secondary criteria. Results show substantial variation across states. Only Alabama, Alaska, Michigan, New Jersey, Washington, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia received B grades, indicating relatively strong laws. Four states received F grades and twelve received E grades, reflecting weak and less comprehensive child restraint laws. These findings highlight the need for stronger and more uniform child restraint laws nationwide.

Journal of Transportation Safety & Security
University Transportation Center for Alabama (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.