Distributed Intrusion Detection Systems: Architecture, Challenges, And Performance Evaluation

The rapid growth of computer networks, cloud computing, and Internet of Things (IoT) devices has increased the number and complexity of cyberattacks.Traditional Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), which depend mainly on a central system, can face difficulties when dealing with large amounts of network traffic and monitoring different parts of a network.Distributed Intrusion Detection Systems (DIDS) offer a solution by using multiple detection systems that work together to monitor network activities and identify possible attacks.This paper provides an overview of DIDS and discusses different architectures, including hierarchical, peer topeer, multi-agent, and cloud-and edge-based approaches.It also explains the main functions of DIDS, such as collecting network data, analysing activities, sharing information between detection nodes, and responding to detected threats.The paper discusses the main benefits of DIDS, including better scalability, improved reliability, and the ability to monitor larger and distributed networks.At the same time, several challenges are considered, such as communication between detection nodes, maintaining consistent information, managing trust, handling high network traffic, and protecting the detection system from attacks.The performance of DIDS can be measured using factors such as detection accuracy, false positive rate, detection time, throughput, and resource usage.Common datasets, including NSLKDD, CICIDS2017, and UNSW-NB15, are used in research to evaluate intrusion detection methods.The paper also discusses the balance between good detection performance and the resources required by the system.Finally, future research areas such as privacy-preserving detection, load balancing, federated learning, blockchain based trust, and edge computing are discussed as possible ways to make Distributed Intrusion Detection Systems more secure, reliable, and efficient.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64643/ijirt.208480-459
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Distributed Intrusion Detection Systems: Architecture, Challenges, And Performance Evaluation

Prof. Rajashri S. Khadake, Mr. Piyush Mahesh Tiwatne, Ms. Sakshi Vishwas Gade, Mr. Laxman Jalindar Gaikwad et al.
International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

Distributed Intrusion Detection Systems: Architecture, Challenges, And Performance Evaluation

Prof. Rajashri S. Khadake, Mr. Piyush Mahesh Tiwatne, Ms. Sakshi Vishwas Gade, Mr. Laxman Jalindar Gaikwad, Ms. Pooja Govindram Parmar
article en

Abstract

The rapid growth of computer networks, cloud computing, and Internet of Things (IoT) devices has increased the number and complexity of cyberattacks.Traditional Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), which depend mainly on a central system, can face difficulties when dealing with large amounts of network traffic and monitoring different parts of a network.Distributed Intrusion Detection Systems (DIDS) offer a solution by using multiple detection systems that work together to monitor network activities and identify possible attacks.This paper provides an overview of DIDS and discusses different architectures, including hierarchical, peer topeer, multi-agent, and cloud-and edge-based approaches.It also explains the main functions of DIDS, such as collecting network data, analysing activities, sharing information between detection nodes, and responding to detected threats.The paper discusses the main benefits of DIDS, including better scalability, improved reliability, and the ability to monitor larger and distributed networks.At the same time, several challenges are considered, such as communication between detection nodes, maintaining consistent information, managing trust, handling high network traffic, and protecting the detection system from attacks.The performance of DIDS can be measured using factors such as detection accuracy, false positive rate, detection time, throughput, and resource usage.Common datasets, including NSLKDD, CICIDS2017, and UNSW-NB15, are used in research to evaluate intrusion detection methods.The paper also discusses the balance between good detection performance and the resources required by the system.Finally, future research areas such as privacy-preserving detection, load balancing, federated learning, blockchain based trust, and edge computing are discussed as possible ways to make Distributed Intrusion Detection Systems more secure, reliable, and efficient.

International Journal of Innovative Research in TechnologyVol. 13(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Distributed Intrusion Detection Systems: Architecture, Challenges, And Performance Evaluation — Prof. Rajashri S. Khadake, Mr. Piyush Mahesh Tiwatne, et al. · International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS