Interactive 360 video for catheterization-laboratory education in undergraduate cardiology clerkship: a retrospective two-period crossover study

Catheterization-laboratory clerkship currently offers inconsistent learning opportunities and limited access to actual patients. Immersive 360 video is increasingly used in health professions education, but most modules are passive observations. We examined changes in self-rated understanding after an interactive 360 video module during cardiology clerkship, comparing two implementation sequences relative to catheterization-laboratory observation. We conducted a retrospective, non-randomized, quasi-experimental two-period crossover study. We assigned 88 fifth-year medical students to either an interactive-360-video-first group or to a catheterization-laboratory-first group according to their clerkship schedule. This was followed by the other sequence. The module used 360 video recordings of an actual catheterization laboratory, with pointer-based object identification, synchronized headset playback, and real-time monitoring of learners’ gaze. Self-rated understanding (mean of 10 items; 1–5) was measured at baseline, after the first session, and after the second session. Post-session scores were analyzed with a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for baseline and period. Fifty-one students completed both sessions and all assessments (interactive-360-video-first, n = 28; catheterization-laboratory-first, n = 23). Baseline scores were comparable (2.70 ± 0.56 vs. 2.52 ± 0.83; p = 0.37). After the first session, the interactive-360-video-first group scored higher (4.34 ± 0.58 vs. 3.41 ± 0.92; p < 0.001), whereas after both sessions the groups converged (4.45 ± 0.53 vs. 4.41 ± 0.60; p = 0.80). In the mixed-effects model, post-session understanding was higher after the immersive video module than after catheterization-laboratory observation (adjusted difference, 0.44 points; 95% CI, 0.22–0.66; p < 0.001). The catheterization-laboratory session only significantly increased understanding when delivered first, whereas the interactive 360 video session produced significant gains in either order. Our interactive 360 video module was associated with greater early gains in self-rated understanding. Similar modules may complement catheterization-laboratory observation, supporting both preparation and consolidation in cardiology clerkship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10396-3
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Interactive 360 video for catheterization-laboratory education in undergraduate cardiology clerkship: a retrospective two-period crossover study

Takanori Hirano, Takashi Tanimoto, Manabu Kashiwagi, Ken-ya Murata et al.
BMC Medical Education
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Interactive 360 video for catheterization-laboratory education in undergraduate cardiology clerkship: a retrospective two-period crossover study

Takanori Hirano, Takashi Tanimoto, Manabu Kashiwagi, Ken-ya Murata, Yohei Nakatsugawa, Megumi Mori, Masahiro Takahata, Kazuhiro Mizumoto, Atsushi Tanaka, Yoko Sasaki
article en

Abstract

Catheterization-laboratory clerkship currently offers inconsistent learning opportunities and limited access to actual patients. Immersive 360 video is increasingly used in health professions education, but most modules are passive observations. We examined changes in self-rated understanding after an interactive 360 video module during cardiology clerkship, comparing two implementation sequences relative to catheterization-laboratory observation. We conducted a retrospective, non-randomized, quasi-experimental two-period crossover study. We assigned 88 fifth-year medical students to either an interactive-360-video-first group or to a catheterization-laboratory-first group according to their clerkship schedule. This was followed by the other sequence. The module used 360 video recordings of an actual catheterization laboratory, with pointer-based object identification, synchronized headset playback, and real-time monitoring of learners’ gaze. Self-rated understanding (mean of 10 items; 1–5) was measured at baseline, after the first session, and after the second session. Post-session scores were analyzed with a linear mixed-effects model adjusted for baseline and period. Fifty-one students completed both sessions and all assessments (interactive-360-video-first, n = 28; catheterization-laboratory-first, n = 23). Baseline scores were comparable (2.70 ± 0.56 vs. 2.52 ± 0.83; p = 0.37). After the first session, the interactive-360-video-first group scored higher (4.34 ± 0.58 vs. 3.41 ± 0.92; p < 0.001), whereas after both sessions the groups converged (4.45 ± 0.53 vs. 4.41 ± 0.60; p = 0.80). In the mixed-effects model, post-session understanding was higher after the immersive video module than after catheterization-laboratory observation (adjusted difference, 0.44 points; 95% CI, 0.22–0.66; p < 0.001). The catheterization-laboratory session only significantly increased understanding when delivered first, whereas the interactive 360 video session produced significant gains in either order. Our interactive 360 video module was associated with greater early gains in self-rated understanding. Similar modules may complement catheterization-laboratory observation, supporting both preparation and consolidation in cardiology clerkship.

BMC Medical Education
Wakayama Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.