The Age of Maturity of the European Union Anti-Corruption Law

{"most":[0],"recent":[1],"Commission":[2],"Rule":[3,280],"of":[4,16,63,72,74,92,96,111,124,144,177,189,204,207,248,257,281],"Law":[5,282],"Report":[6,283],"has":[7,105,184,265,272],"underscored":[8],"1this":[9],"would":[10],"not":[11,273],"answer":[12],"the":[13,21,26,31,34,40,43,50,61,69,75,93,101,122,142,145,175,202,249,255],"sudden":[14],"increase":[15],"EU":[17,27],"anti-corruption":[18,28,36,90,183],"law":[19,29,155],"in":[20,30,42,254],"last":[22],"decade.":[23],"II.":[24],"Situating":[25],"international":[32,44,179,250],"sphereSince":[33],"1990s,":[35],"regulations":[37],"have":[38,88],"been":[39,106,275],"norm":[41],"sphere.The":[45],"OECD":[46],"Anti-Bribery":[47],"Convention,":[48],"2":[49,288],"United":[51],"Nations":[52],"Convention":[53],"Against":[54],"Corruption,":[55,67],"3":[56],"regional":[57,181],"agreements":[58],"such":[59],"as":[60,114,118,197],"Council":[62],"Europe":[64],"Conventions":[65],"against":[66],"4":[68],"wide":[70],"scope":[71],"implementation":[73],"US":[76,258],"Foreign":[77],"Corrupt":[78],"Practices":[79],"Act":[80],"5":[81],"and":[82,126,135,180,235,293],"countless":[83],"democracy":[84],"promotion":[85],"programs,":[86],"6":[87],"made":[89],"one":[91],"primary":[94],"elements":[95,212],"good":[97],"governance":[98],"programs":[99],"around":[100],"world.This":[102],"regulatory":[103],"flow":[104],"accompanied":[107],"by":[108],"a":[109,115,119,187,198,217,267],"reconceptualisation":[110],"corruptionnot":[112],"merely":[113],"crime,":[116],"but":[117],"threat":[120,200],"to":[121,170,174,201,223],"integrity":[123,236],"legal":[125,146,166,191],"institutional":[127],"orders.7":[128],"Corruption":[129],"replaces":[130],"lawful":[131],"interactions":[132],"between":[133],"citizens":[134],"public":[136,154,239],"officials":[137],"with":[138,216,229],"illicit":[139],"ones,":[140],"undermining":[141],"functioning":[143],"order":[147],"itself.While":[148],"academic":[149],"debate":[150],"continues":[151],"over":[152],"which":[153],"value":[156],"corruption":[157,196],"harms,":[158],"it":[159,164],"is":[160],"widely":[161],"accepted":[162],"that":[163],"disrupts":[165],"systems.8":[167],"In":[168],"response":[169],"this":[171],"threat,":[172],"thanks":[173],"proliferation":[176],"these":[178],"tools,":[182],"evolved":[185],"into":[186],"kind":[188],"\\"transnational":[190],"order.\\"9":[192],"This":[193],"perspective":[194],"treats":[195],"structural":[199],"rule":[203],"law,":[205],"regardless":[206],"scale":[208],"or":[209],"whether":[210],"criminal":[211,227],"are":[213],"involved.It":[214],"aligned":[215],"global":[218],"shift":[219],"toward":[220],"administrative":[221],"responses":[222],"corruption,":[224],"supplementing":[225],"traditional":[226],"enforcement":[228],"tools":[230],"like":[231],"independent":[232],"oversight":[233],"bodies":[234],"rules":[237],"for":[238,260,290],"officials.10":[240],"The":[241],"tide":[242],"has,":[243],"however,":[244],"recently":[245],"turned.Decreasing":[246],"budgets":[247],"development":[251],"agencies":[252],"or,":[253],"case":[256],"Agency":[259],"International":[261],"Development,":[262,294],"their":[263],"dismantling":[264],"sent":[266],"rippling":[268],"effect":[269],"whose":[270],"impact":[271],"yet":[274],"quantified.11":[276],"Looking":[277],"1":[278],"Commission,":[279],"2025,":[284],"General":[285],"Report,":[286],"1.":[287],"Organization":[289],"Economic":[291],"Co-operation":[292]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2026.10137
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Age of Maturity of the European Union Anti-Corruption Law

Franco Peirone, Nedim Hogić
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Corruption and Economic Development
article

The Age of Maturity of the European Union Anti-Corruption Law

Franco Peirone, Nedim Hogić
article en

Abstract

most recent Commission Rule of Law Report has underscored 1this would not answer the sudden increase of EU anti-corruption law in the last decade. II. Situating the EU anti-corruption law in the international sphereSince the 1990s, anti-corruption regulations have been the norm in the international sphere.The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, 2 the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 3 regional agreements such as the Council of Europe Conventions against Corruption, 4 the wide scope of implementation of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 5 and countless democracy promotion programs, 6 have made anti-corruption one of the primary elements of good governance programs around the world.This regulatory flow has been accompanied by a reconceptualisation of corruptionnot merely as a crime, but as a threat to the integrity of legal and institutional orders.7 Corruption replaces lawful interactions between citizens and public officials with illicit ones, undermining the functioning of the legal order itself.While academic debate continues over which public law value corruption harms, it is widely accepted that it disrupts legal systems.8 In response to this threat, thanks to the proliferation of these international and regional tools, anti-corruption has evolved into a kind of "transnational legal order."9 This perspective treats corruption as a structural threat to the rule of law, regardless of scale or whether criminal elements are involved.It aligned with a global shift toward administrative responses to corruption, supplementing traditional criminal enforcement with tools like independent oversight bodies and integrity rules for public officials.10 The tide has, however, recently turned.Decreasing budgets of the international development agencies or, in the case of US Agency for International Development, their dismantling has sent a rippling effect whose impact has not yet been quantified.11 Looking 1 Commission, Rule of Law Report 2025, General Report, 1. 2 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development,

European Journal of Risk Regulation
University of Oslo (NO), Maastricht University (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.