Perspectives on adverse events reporting in hybrid implementation science (IS) clinical trials of approved medications in Sub-Saharan Africa

Implementation science (IS) hybrid type 2 and 3 clinical trials and pure implementation research of approved medications test strategies to increase uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) with well-established safety profiles. Guidance on adverse event (AE) monitoring and reporting for this type of IS studies has not been well-defined. This research aimed to understand current practices and develop recommendations for AE reporting in hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials of approved medications. We used a multi-step, expert-driven process involving: (1) in-depth interviews conducted between August and December 2023 with stakeholders involved in the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute HLB-SIMPLe alliance to identify preliminary recommendations ( n = 20), and (2) validation of the recommendations through stakeholder consultations with Botswana Harvard Health Partnership Community Advisory Board (BHP-CAB) members ( n = 16) and purposively selected multisectoral academic, healthcare, government and non-governmental organization stakeholders ( n = 19). Interview participants agreed that better-designed AE reporting guidelines for IS studies are needed for hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials. Most recommended that only severe medication-related AEs be reported by investigators to regulatory bodies, institutional review boards, and funders. Community representatives felt that all AEs, even minor ones unrelated to implementation strategies, should be reported. Comprehensive and appropriate AE reporting guidelines for hybrid type 2 and 3 implementation trials are needed. Such guidelines should incorporate a range of implementation-specific AEs, including unintended consequences of implementation strategies at multiple levels. The study was conducted as a nested sub-study within the InterCARE study which was registered ClinicalTrials.gov reference NCT05414526. Registered 18 May 2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09991-y
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Perspectives on adverse events reporting in hybrid implementation science (IS) clinical trials of approved medications in Sub-Saharan Africa

Thato Moshomo, Keonayang Kgotlaetsile, Onkabetse Julia Molefe‐Baikai, Tendani Gaolathe et al.
Trials
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Perspectives on adverse events reporting in hybrid implementation science (IS) clinical trials of approved medications in Sub-Saharan Africa

Thato Moshomo, Keonayang Kgotlaetsile, Onkabetse Julia Molefe‐Baikai, Tendani Gaolathe, Laura M. Bogart, Dorcus Kanyenvu, Samanta Lalla-Edward, Lisa R. Hirschhorn, C T Longenecker, Mmoloki C. Molwantwa, Nabila Youssouf, Amelia Van Pelt, Nellie Buleyajabu, Gaone E. Mogaetsho, Nthabiseng Phaladze, Mosepele Mosepele, Kefilwe Mosimanyana
article en

Abstract

Implementation science (IS) hybrid type 2 and 3 clinical trials and pure implementation research of approved medications test strategies to increase uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) with well-established safety profiles. Guidance on adverse event (AE) monitoring and reporting for this type of IS studies has not been well-defined. This research aimed to understand current practices and develop recommendations for AE reporting in hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials of approved medications. We used a multi-step, expert-driven process involving: (1) in-depth interviews conducted between August and December 2023 with stakeholders involved in the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute HLB-SIMPLe alliance to identify preliminary recommendations ( n = 20), and (2) validation of the recommendations through stakeholder consultations with Botswana Harvard Health Partnership Community Advisory Board (BHP-CAB) members ( n = 16) and purposively selected multisectoral academic, healthcare, government and non-governmental organization stakeholders ( n = 19). Interview participants agreed that better-designed AE reporting guidelines for IS studies are needed for hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials. Most recommended that only severe medication-related AEs be reported by investigators to regulatory bodies, institutional review boards, and funders. Community representatives felt that all AEs, even minor ones unrelated to implementation strategies, should be reported. Comprehensive and appropriate AE reporting guidelines for hybrid type 2 and 3 implementation trials are needed. Such guidelines should incorporate a range of implementation-specific AEs, including unintended consequences of implementation strategies at multiple levels. The study was conducted as a nested sub-study within the InterCARE study which was registered ClinicalTrials.gov reference NCT05414526. Registered 18 May 2022.

Trials
Northwestern University (US), RAND Corporation (US), University of Botswana (BW), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), University of Washington (US), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership (BW), Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.