Who Becomes a Deacon? Gendered Vocational Discernment and the Feminization of the United Methodist Diaconate

Gender disparities in religious leadership remain persistent across denominations. While most research emphasizes barriers to women’s advancement into senior leadership roles (vertical segregation), less attention has been paid to gendered sorting across parallel ministry roles (horizontal segregation). Focusing on the vocational diaconate in the United Methodist Church (UMC), this study examines how gendered sorting across ordination tracks is produced through vocational discernment prior to labor market entry. This mixed-methods study combines national UMC administrative appointment data (2000–2021) and longitudinal in-depth interviews with Master of Divinity students ( n = 58) at a UMC-affiliated seminary. Quantitative analyses document gender disparities across the UMC’s two ordination tracks (elders and deacons), while qualitative analysis examines students’ vocational discernment. While the elder track remains male-dominated, the diaconate is persistently feminized, with disparities evident at entry. Women are substantially more likely than men to consider and pursue the diaconate, shaped by “pull” factors (e.g., relational and justice-oriented ministry) and “push” factors (e.g., concerns about congregational leadership and itinerancy). Gender inequality in religious leadership is reproduced not only through demand-side barriers but also through gendered vocational discernment prior to labor market entry, with implications for denominational leaders and seminaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Religious Research
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0034673x261475441
Primary Topic
Christian Theology and Mission
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Who Becomes a Deacon? Gendered Vocational Discernment and the Feminization of the United Methodist Diaconate

Josh Gaghan, Anna Holleman, Kelsey Mischke, Bec Stargel et al.
Review of Religious Research
Christian Theology and Mission
article

Who Becomes a Deacon? Gendered Vocational Discernment and the Feminization of the United Methodist Diaconate

Josh Gaghan, Anna Holleman, Kelsey Mischke, Bec Stargel, Erin F. Johnston
article en

Abstract

Gender disparities in religious leadership remain persistent across denominations. While most research emphasizes barriers to women’s advancement into senior leadership roles (vertical segregation), less attention has been paid to gendered sorting across parallel ministry roles (horizontal segregation). Focusing on the vocational diaconate in the United Methodist Church (UMC), this study examines how gendered sorting across ordination tracks is produced through vocational discernment prior to labor market entry. This mixed-methods study combines national UMC administrative appointment data (2000–2021) and longitudinal in-depth interviews with Master of Divinity students ( n = 58) at a UMC-affiliated seminary. Quantitative analyses document gender disparities across the UMC’s two ordination tracks (elders and deacons), while qualitative analysis examines students’ vocational discernment. While the elder track remains male-dominated, the diaconate is persistently feminized, with disparities evident at entry. Women are substantially more likely than men to consider and pursue the diaconate, shaped by “pull” factors (e.g., relational and justice-oriented ministry) and “push” factors (e.g., concerns about congregational leadership and itinerancy). Gender inequality in religious leadership is reproduced not only through demand-side barriers but also through gendered vocational discernment prior to labor market entry, with implications for denominational leaders and seminaries.

Review of Religious Research
North Carolina State University (US), Duke University (US), Appalachian State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Christian Theology and Mission
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.