Growing palliative and end-of-life care research in the United Kingdom: Findings from a mixed methods survey

Background Globally the number of people with an advanced progressive illness is increasing. Research is essential to inform policy, services and clinical practice to meet their needs. We investigated researcher perspectives on conducting palliative and end-of-life care research in the United Kingdom and what is needed to grow this field. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods online survey of individuals conducting palliative and end-of-life care research in an academic institution or any care setting. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed using a Framework Method. Results Overall, 256 people involved in palliative and end-of-life care research responded (80% female, 85% white, 83% aged over 35). Most worked at a university (79%), 67% worked full-time, 47% had a permanent contract and 9% were clinical academics. Many reported positive aspects of their working environment, such as a collaborative culture and research rigour. Nearly all (90%) wished to continue palliative and end-of-life care research during the next five years, however only 69% believed this was likely. Most common barriers were lack of funding (56%), heavy workload (42%), job insecurity (39%), and limited career progression opportunities (33%). To sustain and grow research activity, participants identified a need for: (i) Greater visibility of palliative and end-of-life care as a vital research field; (ii) Increased funding to support those undertaking palliative and end-of-life care research, across career stages and disciplines; (iii) Increased opportunities for collaboration and networking; (iv) Protected research time, and (v) Support to build a more diverse research community. Conclusions Despite a committed workforce, palliative and end-of-life care research lacks visibility and funding. Increased visibility through knowledge exchange and impact activities, alongside more targeted research funding opportunities, are essential to build research capacity for the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357024
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Growing palliative and end-of-life care research in the United Kingdom: Findings from a mixed methods survey

Donna Wakefield, Ikumi Okamoto, Simon Etkind, Anne Finucane et al.
PLoS ONE
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Growing palliative and end-of-life care research in the United Kingdom: Findings from a mixed methods survey

Donna Wakefield, Ikumi Okamoto, Simon Etkind, Anne Finucane, Yesha Viren Dharamshi, Alice Jin, Tracey McConnell, Anthony Byrne, Fliss Murtagh
article en

Abstract

Background Globally the number of people with an advanced progressive illness is increasing. Research is essential to inform policy, services and clinical practice to meet their needs. We investigated researcher perspectives on conducting palliative and end-of-life care research in the United Kingdom and what is needed to grow this field. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods online survey of individuals conducting palliative and end-of-life care research in an academic institution or any care setting. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, while qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed using a Framework Method. Results Overall, 256 people involved in palliative and end-of-life care research responded (80% female, 85% white, 83% aged over 35). Most worked at a university (79%), 67% worked full-time, 47% had a permanent contract and 9% were clinical academics. Many reported positive aspects of their working environment, such as a collaborative culture and research rigour. Nearly all (90%) wished to continue palliative and end-of-life care research during the next five years, however only 69% believed this was likely. Most common barriers were lack of funding (56%), heavy workload (42%), job insecurity (39%), and limited career progression opportunities (33%). To sustain and grow research activity, participants identified a need for: (i) Greater visibility of palliative and end-of-life care as a vital research field; (ii) Increased funding to support those undertaking palliative and end-of-life care research, across career stages and disciplines; (iii) Increased opportunities for collaboration and networking; (iv) Protected research time, and (v) Support to build a more diverse research community. Conclusions Despite a committed workforce, palliative and end-of-life care research lacks visibility and funding. Increased visibility through knowledge exchange and impact activities, alongside more targeted research funding opportunities, are essential to build research capacity for the future.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Hull (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Velindre NHS Trust (GB), Language Science (South Korea) (KR), Marie Curie Hospice (GB), Hull York Medical School (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.