The AI Overtrust Paradox in Vulnerability Search: When Greater Trust in AI Reduces Perceived Search Effectiveness

We investigate human overreliance on artificial intelligence (AI), a phenomenon in which users fail to critically verify AI outputs despite knowing the system is imperfect. To analyze this interaction, we model a cybersecurity scenario in which a human user and an AI chatbot collaborate to locate a vulnerable node in a large-scale distributed network. We consider a search process in which the probability distribution of the node’s location is updated using Bayes’ rule. In each round, the chatbot sequentially scans the nodes and suggests a potentially vulnerable node; the user then decides whether to accept the detection and end the search or refine the query and continue searching. The goal is to find an efficient scanning algorithm that maximizes the user’s expected satisfaction with the search results. Finally, we provide a formal proof of the “more for less” paradox, demonstrating that reducing trust in AI can, under certain conditions, increase perceived search effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a19090792
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The AI Overtrust Paradox in Vulnerability Search: When Greater Trust in AI Reduces Perceived Search Effectiveness

Boris Kriheli, Eugene Levner
Algorithms
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The AI Overtrust Paradox in Vulnerability Search: When Greater Trust in AI Reduces Perceived Search Effectiveness

Boris Kriheli, Eugene Levner
article en

Abstract

We investigate human overreliance on artificial intelligence (AI), a phenomenon in which users fail to critically verify AI outputs despite knowing the system is imperfect. To analyze this interaction, we model a cybersecurity scenario in which a human user and an AI chatbot collaborate to locate a vulnerable node in a large-scale distributed network. We consider a search process in which the probability distribution of the node’s location is updated using Bayes’ rule. In each round, the chatbot sequentially scans the nodes and suggests a potentially vulnerable node; the user then decides whether to accept the detection and end the search or refine the query and continue searching. The goal is to find an efficient scanning algorithm that maximizes the user’s expected satisfaction with the search results. Finally, we provide a formal proof of the “more for less” paradox, demonstrating that reducing trust in AI can, under certain conditions, increase perceived search effectiveness.

AlgorithmsVol. 19(9)
Ashkelon Academic College (IL), Holon Institute of Technology (IL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The AI Overtrust Paradox in Vulnerability Search: When Greater Trust in AI Reduces Perceived Search Effectiveness — Boris Kriheli, Eugene Levner · Algorithms (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS