Comparative Evaluation of SELECT and Generalized Additive Models for Estimating Gillnet Selectivity of Snow Crab (Chionoecetes opilio) in the East Sea of Korea

This study evaluated snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) gillnet selectivity using the traditional Share Each Length’s Catch Total (SELECT) framework and a generalized additive model (GAM). Comparative fishing experiments were conducted in the East Sea of Korea using four stretched mesh sizes (210, 240, 255, and 270 mm). Among the candidate SELECT models, the binormal model had the lowest Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), although the normal and gamma models also received substantial support (ΔAIC < 2). Under the equal-fishing-power assumption, the ascending L50 increased from 70.47 mm for the 210 mm mesh to 90.60 mm for the 270 mm mesh, indicating a progressive shift in retention toward larger crabs across the tested gear configurations. The final GAM2 and the selected binormal SELECT model produced closely similar fitted selectivity patterns across most of the observed relative-size range and nearly identical in-sample agreement with the observed conditional catch proportions. However, the binormal components should not be interpreted as distinct biological capture mechanisms because capture behavior was not directly observed. Overall, the results support the complementary use of SELECT and GAM for evaluating snow crab gillnet selectivity, while acknowledging uncertainty associated with relative fishing power and the fixed panel arrangement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fishes
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11090545
Primary Topic
Crustacean biology and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative Evaluation of SELECT and Generalized Additive Models for Estimating Gillnet Selectivity of Snow Crab (Chionoecetes opilio) in the East Sea of Korea

Youngil SEO, Seok‐Jin Yoon, Seong-Hun Kim, Sena Baek
Fishes
Crustacean biology and ecology
article

Comparative Evaluation of SELECT and Generalized Additive Models for Estimating Gillnet Selectivity of Snow Crab (Chionoecetes opilio) in the East Sea of Korea

Youngil SEO, Seok‐Jin Yoon, Seong-Hun Kim, Sena Baek
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) gillnet selectivity using the traditional Share Each Length’s Catch Total (SELECT) framework and a generalized additive model (GAM). Comparative fishing experiments were conducted in the East Sea of Korea using four stretched mesh sizes (210, 240, 255, and 270 mm). Among the candidate SELECT models, the binormal model had the lowest Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), although the normal and gamma models also received substantial support (ΔAIC < 2). Under the equal-fishing-power assumption, the ascending L50 increased from 70.47 mm for the 210 mm mesh to 90.60 mm for the 270 mm mesh, indicating a progressive shift in retention toward larger crabs across the tested gear configurations. The final GAM2 and the selected binormal SELECT model produced closely similar fitted selectivity patterns across most of the observed relative-size range and nearly identical in-sample agreement with the observed conditional catch proportions. However, the binormal components should not be interpreted as distinct biological capture mechanisms because capture behavior was not directly observed. Overall, the results support the complementary use of SELECT and GAM for evaluating snow crab gillnet selectivity, while acknowledging uncertainty associated with relative fishing power and the fixed panel arrangement.

FishesVol. 11(9)
National Institute of Fisheries Science (KR), National Fisheries Institute (US), Pukyong National University (KR)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Crustacean biology and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.