Strategies and Challenges in Memristor‐Selector Integration for High‐Density Memory and Compute‐in‐Memory Systems

ABSTRACT Memristor crossbar arrays offer ultrahigh integration density and exceptional area efficiency, establishing a promising platform for data storage and compute‐in‐memory (CIM) architectures, including neuromorphic and analogue vector–matrix multiplication (VMM) accelerators. Their compact 4F 2 footprint and compatibility with 3D stacking enable dense, low‐latency compute‐in‐memory architectures can alleviate the von Neumann bottleneck. By emulating large‐scale synaptic networks, these arrays support brain‐inspired information processing with reduced energy consumption. However, large‐scale implementation remains constrained by parasitic sneak‐path currents, which induce unintended conduction through neighboring cells, degrade read–write fidelity, and increase power dissipation. This review presents a systematic analysis of resistive‐switching mechanisms and current–voltage characteristics, clarifying the non‐linear relationship between switching parameters and synaptic functionality. We evaluate key performance metrics across state‐of‐the‐art memristors, highlighting progress toward femtojoule‐level switching energies and biologically comparable efficiency. Comparative assessments of transistor‐ and memristor‐based synapses further elucidate energy–performance trade‐offs in CIM hardware. We then examine selector‐integration strategies in one‐transistor–one‐memristor and one‐diode–one‐memristor architectures, with emphasis on rectification strength, threshold nonlinearity, bidirectional plasticity, and back‐end‐of‐line compatibility. As a result, we identify intrinsically bidirectional, scalable selector–memristor co‐design as a critical pathway toward robust, low‐power memristor CIM and neuromorphic crossbar systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Electronic Materials
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.70558
Primary Topic
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Strategies and Challenges in Memristor‐Selector Integration for High‐Density Memory and Compute‐in‐Memory Systems

Firman Mangasa Simanjuntak, Zohreh Hajiabadi, Harold M. H. Chong, David B. Thomas
Advanced Electronic Materials
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
article

Strategies and Challenges in Memristor‐Selector Integration for High‐Density Memory and Compute‐in‐Memory Systems

Firman Mangasa Simanjuntak, Zohreh Hajiabadi, Harold M. H. Chong, David B. Thomas
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Memristor crossbar arrays offer ultrahigh integration density and exceptional area efficiency, establishing a promising platform for data storage and compute‐in‐memory (CIM) architectures, including neuromorphic and analogue vector–matrix multiplication (VMM) accelerators. Their compact 4F 2 footprint and compatibility with 3D stacking enable dense, low‐latency compute‐in‐memory architectures can alleviate the von Neumann bottleneck. By emulating large‐scale synaptic networks, these arrays support brain‐inspired information processing with reduced energy consumption. However, large‐scale implementation remains constrained by parasitic sneak‐path currents, which induce unintended conduction through neighboring cells, degrade read–write fidelity, and increase power dissipation. This review presents a systematic analysis of resistive‐switching mechanisms and current–voltage characteristics, clarifying the non‐linear relationship between switching parameters and synaptic functionality. We evaluate key performance metrics across state‐of‐the‐art memristors, highlighting progress toward femtojoule‐level switching energies and biologically comparable efficiency. Comparative assessments of transistor‐ and memristor‐based synapses further elucidate energy–performance trade‐offs in CIM hardware. We then examine selector‐integration strategies in one‐transistor–one‐memristor and one‐diode–one‐memristor architectures, with emphasis on rectification strength, threshold nonlinearity, bidirectional plasticity, and back‐end‐of‐line compatibility. As a result, we identify intrinsically bidirectional, scalable selector–memristor co‐design as a critical pathway toward robust, low‐power memristor CIM and neuromorphic crossbar systems.

Advanced Electronic Materials
University of Southampton (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategies and Challenges in Memristor‐Selector Integration for High‐Density Memory and Compute‐in‐Memory Systems — Firman Mangasa Simanjuntak, Zohreh Hajiabadi, et al. · Advanced Electronic Materials (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS