Evolving Evidence-Driven Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock Management

Although existing guidelines and expert consensus documents provide a general framework for management of cardiogenic shock (CS), a substantial body of evidence has yet emerged which has not been fully incorporated into current recommendations. This State-of-the Art review synthesizes both established and recent literature to provide an updated perspective on contemporary CS management. We review randomized controlled trials and key observational studies evaluating invasive hemodynamic monitoring, pharmacologic therapies, temporary mechanical circulatory support, and structural and valvular interventions. We critically appraise trial design, patient heterogeneity, and methodological limitations that influence interpretation and clinical applicability. Finally, we highlight persistent gaps and ongoing trials that aim to refine risk stratification and treatment strategies. This review provides a comprehensive, up-to-date synthesis of the CS literature and outlines key directions for future research and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACC Advances
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103225
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evolving Evidence-Driven Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock Management

Megan Pelter, Nikhil Narang, Dustin Hillerson, Anju Bhardwaj et al.
JACC Advances
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Evolving Evidence-Driven Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock Management

Megan Pelter, Nikhil Narang, Dustin Hillerson, Anju Bhardwaj, Anjan Sinha, Maya Guglin
article en

Abstract

Although existing guidelines and expert consensus documents provide a general framework for management of cardiogenic shock (CS), a substantial body of evidence has yet emerged which has not been fully incorporated into current recommendations. This State-of-the Art review synthesizes both established and recent literature to provide an updated perspective on contemporary CS management. We review randomized controlled trials and key observational studies evaluating invasive hemodynamic monitoring, pharmacologic therapies, temporary mechanical circulatory support, and structural and valvular interventions. We critically appraise trial design, patient heterogeneity, and methodological limitations that influence interpretation and clinical applicability. Finally, we highlight persistent gaps and ongoing trials that aim to refine risk stratification and treatment strategies. This review provides a comprehensive, up-to-date synthesis of the CS literature and outlines key directions for future research and clinical practice.

JACC AdvancesVol. 5(10)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Loma Linda University (US), University of Chicago (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, University of Virginia (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evolving Evidence-Driven Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock Management — Megan Pelter, Nikhil Narang, et al. · JACC Advances (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS