Older Men’s Preferences for HIV Testing in Primary Care Setting: Evidence from a Best–Worst Scaling Study in China

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) among adults aged 50 and older presents an emerging challenge in China, hindered by reasons like insufficient health checks and low self-perceived HIV risk. To overcome these barriers and assist decision-makers in prioritizing interventions, it is critical to investigate HIV testing preferences in this population and identify which service characteristics are the preferred aspects, especially within the primary care setting. From July 1 to October 30, 2025, a face-to-face, case 1 best–worst scaling (BWS) survey was performed to quantify older men’s preferences for HIV testing across five cities in eastern, central and western Guizhou. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, attributes were selected through prior literature review and qualitative study. We calculated the BWS scores, estimated the relative importance of each attribute and used the coefficients derived from the mixed logit models to calculate share of preference (SP) to interpret final results. Regression analyses were used to explore the heterogeneity of HIV testing preferences across the sample. A total of seven core attributes were identified in this BWS design. Among 338 respondents (mean age 61.2 ± 7.8 years), 71.3% resided in rural areas. The overall responses demonstrated ‘comprehensive care’ (SP 22.2%) and ‘confidentiality’ (SP 18.1%) were the most highly prioritized, followed by ‘anxiety alleviation’ (SP 14.6%), ‘consultation context’ (SP 13.5%) and ‘clear explanation’ (SP 13.1%). The least prioritized attributes were ‘incentive’ (SP 10.2%) and ‘appointment’ (SP 8.3%) for HIV testing services. Notably, significant heterogeneity in preferences was observed across subgroups, with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics identified as key sources of variation. Among the sample population, additional testing incentives were perceived as a more important attribute for older participants and those who had never tested before. Supplementing conventional clinic-based testing with comprehensive service delivery is a promising approach to potentially increase HIV testing uptake among men aged 50 and older in China. People also strongly prioritized the confidentiality of HIV test results in the primary care setting. Our findings provided implications for service providers and policymakers to develop client-centered, differentiated HIV testing strategies in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Patient
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-026-00839-w
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Older Men’s Preferences for HIV Testing in Primary Care Setting: Evidence from a Best–Worst Scaling Study in China

Qiang Sun, Yangxi Tan, Xiaohan Qian, Min Zheng et al.
Patient
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Older Men’s Preferences for HIV Testing in Primary Care Setting: Evidence from a Best–Worst Scaling Study in China

Qiang Sun, Yangxi Tan, Xiaohan Qian, Min Zheng, Jia Yin, Qing He
article en

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) among adults aged 50 and older presents an emerging challenge in China, hindered by reasons like insufficient health checks and low self-perceived HIV risk. To overcome these barriers and assist decision-makers in prioritizing interventions, it is critical to investigate HIV testing preferences in this population and identify which service characteristics are the preferred aspects, especially within the primary care setting. From July 1 to October 30, 2025, a face-to-face, case 1 best–worst scaling (BWS) survey was performed to quantify older men’s preferences for HIV testing across five cities in eastern, central and western Guizhou. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, attributes were selected through prior literature review and qualitative study. We calculated the BWS scores, estimated the relative importance of each attribute and used the coefficients derived from the mixed logit models to calculate share of preference (SP) to interpret final results. Regression analyses were used to explore the heterogeneity of HIV testing preferences across the sample. A total of seven core attributes were identified in this BWS design. Among 338 respondents (mean age 61.2 ± 7.8 years), 71.3% resided in rural areas. The overall responses demonstrated ‘comprehensive care’ (SP 22.2%) and ‘confidentiality’ (SP 18.1%) were the most highly prioritized, followed by ‘anxiety alleviation’ (SP 14.6%), ‘consultation context’ (SP 13.5%) and ‘clear explanation’ (SP 13.1%). The least prioritized attributes were ‘incentive’ (SP 10.2%) and ‘appointment’ (SP 8.3%) for HIV testing services. Notably, significant heterogeneity in preferences was observed across subgroups, with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics identified as key sources of variation. Among the sample population, additional testing incentives were perceived as a more important attribute for older participants and those who had never tested before. Supplementing conventional clinic-based testing with comprehensive service delivery is a promising approach to potentially increase HIV testing uptake among men aged 50 and older in China. People also strongly prioritized the confidentiality of HIV test results in the primary care setting. Our findings provided implications for service providers and policymakers to develop client-centered, differentiated HIV testing strategies in China.

Patient
Shandong University (CN), Guizhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN), Shandong Management University (CN), China National Health Development Research Center (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.