Adversarial vulnerabilities and mitigations in unsupervised machine learning: a systematic review

Abstract The use of unsupervised models is growing with the desire to use unlabelled data, and ensuring their robustness against adversaries has become increasingly essential. Although there are surveys that cover some attacks and defences on unsupervised models, a comprehensive review on this topic is missing. We systematically analysed 93 published papers from an initial list of 21,195 papers, identified via a systematic search and reduced through systematic filtration. Our study covered six unsupervised model categories: clustering, super-resolution, autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, diffusion models, and transformers. We systematically synthesised the eight types of attacks and nine types of defences identified across these models, providing top-level descriptions, comparisons of methods across unsupervised models, and the essential differences of these attacks and defences in supervised versus unsupervised settings. Our results provide a comprehensive review of current research in this area, identify critical gaps, and offer recommendations for future studies to mitigate the security risks associated with unsupervised learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-026-11695-3
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Adversarial vulnerabilities and mitigations in unsupervised machine learning: a systematic review

Mathias Lundteigen Mohus, Jingyue Li
Artificial Intelligence Review
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Adversarial vulnerabilities and mitigations in unsupervised machine learning: a systematic review

Mathias Lundteigen Mohus, Jingyue Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract The use of unsupervised models is growing with the desire to use unlabelled data, and ensuring their robustness against adversaries has become increasingly essential. Although there are surveys that cover some attacks and defences on unsupervised models, a comprehensive review on this topic is missing. We systematically analysed 93 published papers from an initial list of 21,195 papers, identified via a systematic search and reduced through systematic filtration. Our study covered six unsupervised model categories: clustering, super-resolution, autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, diffusion models, and transformers. We systematically synthesised the eight types of attacks and nine types of defences identified across these models, providing top-level descriptions, comparisons of methods across unsupervised models, and the essential differences of these attacks and defences in supervised versus unsupervised settings. Our results provide a comprehensive review of current research in this area, identify critical gaps, and offer recommendations for future studies to mitigate the security risks associated with unsupervised learning.

Artificial Intelligence Review
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adversarial vulnerabilities and mitigations in unsupervised machine learning: a systematic review — Mathias Lundteigen Mohus, Jingyue Li · Artificial Intelligence Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS