When Flexibility Becomes Ambiguity: Implementation Dilemmas in a Danish Community-Based Health Promotion Programme

Abstract Childhood overweight and obesity are major public health challenges, linked to social inequality. Community-based and system-oriented interventions have been promoted as alternatives to individually focused approaches, yet their implementation remains poorly understood. This study examines the implementation of a flexible and locally anchored community-based health promotion programme targeting children aged 0–10 years in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in Danish municipalities. This study draws on data from a process evaluation conducted from 2020 to 2024. The data includes 37 semi-structured interviews with practitioners, heads of institutions, and programme coordinators; 34 days of participant observation; annual implementation logs; and programme materials. Data were analysed using cross-thematic analysis. The programme’s broad, non-prescriptive framing created shared language, legitimacy and coordination, and it enabled staff to recognise and strengthen ongoing efforts. It also meant that implementation often centred on selecting and amplifying existing practices, whereas more demanding activities were downscaled or postponed, with substantial local variation shaped by capacity. These dynamics illustrate an inherent tension in implementation: relying on established practices supports uptake, yet it risks producing incremental adjustments that may reinforce existing advantages and insufficiently address social inequality. We conceptualise these outcomes as a mix of meaningful alignment and superficial change. Flexible, locally anchored community-based programmes can foster ownership and legitimacy, but risk remaining largely symbolic when they rely heavily on existing practices and frontline discretion. To avoid reinforcing inequalities, such designs require clearer expectations, supportive governance structures and targeted resources that explicitly address structural conditions in children’s everyday environments

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Implementation Research and Applications
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-026-00255-0
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

When Flexibility Becomes Ambiguity: Implementation Dilemmas in a Danish Community-Based Health Promotion Programme

Dina Danielsen, Calina Leonhardt, Sigurd Lauridsen
Global Implementation Research and Applications
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

When Flexibility Becomes Ambiguity: Implementation Dilemmas in a Danish Community-Based Health Promotion Programme

Dina Danielsen, Calina Leonhardt, Sigurd Lauridsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Childhood overweight and obesity are major public health challenges, linked to social inequality. Community-based and system-oriented interventions have been promoted as alternatives to individually focused approaches, yet their implementation remains poorly understood. This study examines the implementation of a flexible and locally anchored community-based health promotion programme targeting children aged 0–10 years in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in Danish municipalities. This study draws on data from a process evaluation conducted from 2020 to 2024. The data includes 37 semi-structured interviews with practitioners, heads of institutions, and programme coordinators; 34 days of participant observation; annual implementation logs; and programme materials. Data were analysed using cross-thematic analysis. The programme’s broad, non-prescriptive framing created shared language, legitimacy and coordination, and it enabled staff to recognise and strengthen ongoing efforts. It also meant that implementation often centred on selecting and amplifying existing practices, whereas more demanding activities were downscaled or postponed, with substantial local variation shaped by capacity. These dynamics illustrate an inherent tension in implementation: relying on established practices supports uptake, yet it risks producing incremental adjustments that may reinforce existing advantages and insufficiently address social inequality. We conceptualise these outcomes as a mix of meaningful alignment and superficial change. Flexible, locally anchored community-based programmes can foster ownership and legitimacy, but risk remaining largely symbolic when they rely heavily on existing practices and frontline discretion. To avoid reinforcing inequalities, such designs require clearer expectations, supportive governance structures and targeted resources that explicitly address structural conditions in children’s everyday environments

Global Implementation Research and Applications
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Flexibility Becomes Ambiguity: Implementation Dilemmas in a Danish Community-Based Health Promotion Programme — Dina Danielsen, Calina Leonhardt, et al. · Global Implementation Research and Applications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS