Can the CSRC’s random inspection system curb corporate goodwill bubbles?

Goodwill bubbles pose a serious threat to the stable development of capital markets. This paper exploits the random inspection system implemented by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) to construct a multi-period difference‑in‑differences model and examines the governance effect of administrative regulation on corporate goodwill bubbles. We find that the random inspection system significantly curbs the formation of goodwill bubbles, and the underlying mechanism can be explained by the fraud triangle theory. Mechanism tests indicate that the system exerts its governance role by restraining managerial self‑interest and myopia (motivation), enhancing corporate governance and external monitoring (opportunity), and curbing regulatory capture and irrational sentiment (rationalisation). Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the inhibitory effect is more pronounced in firms with weaker internal control, lower embeddedness of party organisation governance, less institutional ownership, and less analyst coverage, and is stronger in regions with higher violation rates and industries with greater uncertainty. Further analysis shows that the “look‑back” mechanism reinforces the regulatory deterrence, and the system not only squeezes out goodwill bubbles but also effectively reduces stock price crash risk and curtails management selling. This paper offers implications for optimising administrative regulation and preventing financial risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Journal of Accounting Studies
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2026.2725356
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Can the CSRC’s random inspection system curb corporate goodwill bubbles?

Lingyun Xiong, Yao Tong, Linfei Huang, Lijuan Yang
China Journal of Accounting Studies
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Can the CSRC’s random inspection system curb corporate goodwill bubbles?

Lingyun Xiong, Yao Tong, Linfei Huang, Lijuan Yang
article en

Abstract

Goodwill bubbles pose a serious threat to the stable development of capital markets. This paper exploits the random inspection system implemented by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) to construct a multi-period difference‑in‑differences model and examines the governance effect of administrative regulation on corporate goodwill bubbles. We find that the random inspection system significantly curbs the formation of goodwill bubbles, and the underlying mechanism can be explained by the fraud triangle theory. Mechanism tests indicate that the system exerts its governance role by restraining managerial self‑interest and myopia (motivation), enhancing corporate governance and external monitoring (opportunity), and curbing regulatory capture and irrational sentiment (rationalisation). Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the inhibitory effect is more pronounced in firms with weaker internal control, lower embeddedness of party organisation governance, less institutional ownership, and less analyst coverage, and is stronger in regions with higher violation rates and industries with greater uncertainty. Further analysis shows that the “look‑back” mechanism reinforces the regulatory deterrence, and the system not only squeezes out goodwill bubbles but also effectively reduces stock price crash risk and curtails management selling. This paper offers implications for optimising administrative regulation and preventing financial risks.

China Journal of Accounting Studies
Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.