Timing and safety of prone positioning following median sternotomy in infants with single-ventricle physiology

Abstract Background: Prone positioning is an essential component of early rehabilitation and motor development in infants following cardiac surgery involving median sternotomy; however, restrictions remain variable due to concerns regarding sternal healing and safety. Due to a lack of guiding evidence, many institutions implement a time-based restriction to prone positioning. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of infants with single-ventricle physiology undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy at a single paediatric centre between 2022 and 2025. Data collected included time to physical therapy evaluation, time to initiation of prone positioning, clinical factors influencing positioning, and sternal healing outcomes after discharge. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise timing and outcomes. Results: A total of 37 patients were included with 46 surgical encounters. The median age at first surgery was 65 days (interquartile range: 6–204). Physical therapy evaluation occurred at a median of 9 days post-operatively (interquartile range: 7–15; range: 3–29), and prone positioning was initiated at a median of 15 days (interquartile range: 10–22; range: 4–115). Timing differed by surgical stage, with earlier initiation following Glenn compared to Norwood procedures. Delays in prone positioning were associated with medical instability, delayed sternal closure, and the presence of invasive lines and devices. No cases of sternal dehiscence, infection, or adverse healing outcomes were identified at outpatient follow-ups. Conclusions: Prone positioning following infant cardiac surgery demonstrates variability in timing but appears safe when guided by clinical stability and patient-specific factors. These findings support a shift from time-based restrictions to individualised, criteria-driven approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology in the Young
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1047951126124068
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Timing and safety of prone positioning following median sternotomy in infants with single-ventricle physiology

Amanda Clifton, David Kalfa, Lawrence P. Cahalin, Noelle Milnamow
Cardiology in the Young
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Timing and safety of prone positioning following median sternotomy in infants with single-ventricle physiology

Amanda Clifton, David Kalfa, Lawrence P. Cahalin, Noelle Milnamow
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Prone positioning is an essential component of early rehabilitation and motor development in infants following cardiac surgery involving median sternotomy; however, restrictions remain variable due to concerns regarding sternal healing and safety. Due to a lack of guiding evidence, many institutions implement a time-based restriction to prone positioning. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of infants with single-ventricle physiology undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy at a single paediatric centre between 2022 and 2025. Data collected included time to physical therapy evaluation, time to initiation of prone positioning, clinical factors influencing positioning, and sternal healing outcomes after discharge. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise timing and outcomes. Results: A total of 37 patients were included with 46 surgical encounters. The median age at first surgery was 65 days (interquartile range: 6–204). Physical therapy evaluation occurred at a median of 9 days post-operatively (interquartile range: 7–15; range: 3–29), and prone positioning was initiated at a median of 15 days (interquartile range: 10–22; range: 4–115). Timing differed by surgical stage, with earlier initiation following Glenn compared to Norwood procedures. Delays in prone positioning were associated with medical instability, delayed sternal closure, and the presence of invasive lines and devices. No cases of sternal dehiscence, infection, or adverse healing outcomes were identified at outpatient follow-ups. Conclusions: Prone positioning following infant cardiac surgery demonstrates variability in timing but appears safe when guided by clinical stability and patient-specific factors. These findings support a shift from time-based restrictions to individualised, criteria-driven approaches.

Cardiology in the Young
University of Miami (US), Miami Children's Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Timing and safety of prone positioning following median sternotomy in infants with single-ventricle physiology — Amanda Clifton, David Kalfa, et al. · Cardiology in the Young (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS