Effects of Supplementary Fertilization on Physiological Traits and Yield of Soybean Following Drought-Flood Abrupt Alternations of Varying Intensities

Drought-flood abrupt alternation (DFAA) events severely constrain soybean production, yet the physiological effects of supplementary fertilization and other measures following such events are unclear. This study investigated the effects of supplementary fertilization (SF) on the physiological characteristics and yield of soybean after different intensities of DFAA events. Seven treatments were set up in the experiment: drought rapidly followed by light, moderate, or heavy waterlogging (D-LW, D-MW, D-HW), SF after DFAA (D-LWF, D-MWF, D-HWF), and normal water supply (control, CK). Soybean growth, leaf physiological indicators, above-ground dry matter, yield, and yield components were measured throughout the experiment. The results showed that SF promoted stem diameter and leaf growth in soybeans under drought-to-waterlogging stress. At 35 days after fertilization, the D-HWF treatment significantly outperformed D-HW in stem diameter and leaf area. At 10 days after fertilization, compared with the corresponding unfertilized treatments, the D-L/-M/-HWF treatments significantly increased leaf relative water content (LRWC, by 13.55–33.39%) and SOD activity, while the D-M/-HWF treatments reduced the chlorophyll a/b ratio by 6.14–8.29%. Under uniform SF application, yield-related traits exhibited a statistically non-significant positive recovery trend under the D-MW and D-HW treatments (except for the effective grain number and total grain number). The D-MWF and D-HWF combinations significantly increased effective grain number and total grain number by 39.20–88.59% relative to their unfertilized controls. SF application tended to enhance soybean yield under DFAA, with D-MWF and D-HWF showing significant yield increases of 63.24% and 57.04% over D-MW and D-HW, respectively. The yield compensation rate rose substantially, with fertilized treatments recovering to 71.28–74.69% of the CK level. Collectively, these results indicate that SF alleviates yield loss under DFAA stress through a combination of optimized pod traits, increased grain number, alleviated oxidative damage during later recovery stages, and promoted regrowth. Under the present experimental conditions, greater compensatory effects were observed under moderate and heavy post-drought waterlogging than under light post-drought waterlogging, reflecting the combined influences of DFAA severity and the duration of pre-fertilization recovery intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16181988
Primary Topic
Plant responses to water stress
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effects of Supplementary Fertilization on Physiological Traits and Yield of Soybean Following Drought-Flood Abrupt Alternations of Varying Intensities

Xiaopei Tang, Zihan Zhao, Jun Wei, Caixia Zheng et al.
Agriculture
Plant responses to water stress
article

Effects of Supplementary Fertilization on Physiological Traits and Yield of Soybean Following Drought-Flood Abrupt Alternations of Varying Intensities

Xiaopei Tang, Zihan Zhao, Jun Wei, Caixia Zheng, Yingjun She, Zhiliang Zhang, Ping Li, Jiajia Liu, Yingkun Yu, Zizhe Zhou, Yanglantian Song, Wenbo Yue, Zeqin Lai, Jixiao Wu
article en

Abstract

Drought-flood abrupt alternation (DFAA) events severely constrain soybean production, yet the physiological effects of supplementary fertilization and other measures following such events are unclear. This study investigated the effects of supplementary fertilization (SF) on the physiological characteristics and yield of soybean after different intensities of DFAA events. Seven treatments were set up in the experiment: drought rapidly followed by light, moderate, or heavy waterlogging (D-LW, D-MW, D-HW), SF after DFAA (D-LWF, D-MWF, D-HWF), and normal water supply (control, CK). Soybean growth, leaf physiological indicators, above-ground dry matter, yield, and yield components were measured throughout the experiment. The results showed that SF promoted stem diameter and leaf growth in soybeans under drought-to-waterlogging stress. At 35 days after fertilization, the D-HWF treatment significantly outperformed D-HW in stem diameter and leaf area. At 10 days after fertilization, compared with the corresponding unfertilized treatments, the D-L/-M/-HWF treatments significantly increased leaf relative water content (LRWC, by 13.55–33.39%) and SOD activity, while the D-M/-HWF treatments reduced the chlorophyll a/b ratio by 6.14–8.29%. Under uniform SF application, yield-related traits exhibited a statistically non-significant positive recovery trend under the D-MW and D-HW treatments (except for the effective grain number and total grain number). The D-MWF and D-HWF combinations significantly increased effective grain number and total grain number by 39.20–88.59% relative to their unfertilized controls. SF application tended to enhance soybean yield under DFAA, with D-MWF and D-HWF showing significant yield increases of 63.24% and 57.04% over D-MW and D-HW, respectively. The yield compensation rate rose substantially, with fertilized treatments recovering to 71.28–74.69% of the CK level. Collectively, these results indicate that SF alleviates yield loss under DFAA stress through a combination of optimized pod traits, increased grain number, alleviated oxidative damage during later recovery stages, and promoted regrowth. Under the present experimental conditions, greater compensatory effects were observed under moderate and heavy post-drought waterlogging than under light post-drought waterlogging, reflecting the combined influences of DFAA severity and the duration of pre-fertilization recovery intervals.

AgricultureVol. 16(18)
Sichuan Agricultural University (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Farmland Irrigation Research Institute (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant responses to water stress
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.