Bee-plant interactions and network structure across land cover types in New Zealand

Land cover change and biological invasions alter pollinator communities and the distribution of floral resources, but how these changes influence specific bee–plant interactions across different landscapes and time often remains unclear. We reconstructed bee–plant interaction networks from New Zealand using 2,266 interactions extracted from digitised natural history collections and compared interaction patterns between land cover dominated by native or exotic vegetation. Native bees accounted for most recorded interactions across all land cover types. Bee and plant biostatus showed strong non-random associations, with native bees interacting mainly with native plants and exotic bees interacting more frequently with exotic plants. Network-level specialisation was moderate and varied little among land cover types (H2′ = 0.63–0.68), although species-level specialisation differed substantially among bee species. Preference indices showed that most native bee species exhibited neutral or negative preferences for exotic plants, whereas several exotic bee species preferentially visited exotic plants. Temporal analyses further showed that native bees increasingly incorporated exotic plants into their interactions through time, while exotic bees showed increased use of native plants. Our results suggest that changes to land cover influences bee–plant interaction patterns while native and exotic bees differ in their use of floral resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-026-10286-x
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Bee-plant interactions and network structure across land cover types in New Zealand

Darren Ward, Heng Zhang
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Plant and animal studies
article

Bee-plant interactions and network structure across land cover types in New Zealand

Darren Ward, Heng Zhang
article en

Abstract

Land cover change and biological invasions alter pollinator communities and the distribution of floral resources, but how these changes influence specific bee–plant interactions across different landscapes and time often remains unclear. We reconstructed bee–plant interaction networks from New Zealand using 2,266 interactions extracted from digitised natural history collections and compared interaction patterns between land cover dominated by native or exotic vegetation. Native bees accounted for most recorded interactions across all land cover types. Bee and plant biostatus showed strong non-random associations, with native bees interacting mainly with native plants and exotic bees interacting more frequently with exotic plants. Network-level specialisation was moderate and varied little among land cover types (H2′ = 0.63–0.68), although species-level specialisation differed substantially among bee species. Preference indices showed that most native bee species exhibited neutral or negative preferences for exotic plants, whereas several exotic bee species preferentially visited exotic plants. Temporal analyses further showed that native bees increasingly incorporated exotic plants into their interactions through time, while exotic bees showed increased use of native plants. Our results suggest that changes to land cover influences bee–plant interaction patterns while native and exotic bees differ in their use of floral resources.

Arthropod-Plant InteractionsVol. 20(5)
University of Auckland (NZ), Unitec Institute of Technology (NZ)
Serono Symposia International Foundation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.