Indirect Estimation of the Number of Prevalent Cases – Relaxing the Steady State Assumption

Background: Prevalence is an important measure of disease frequency, helping characterize disease burden and health care needs. If direct estimates are unavailable (e.g. from surveys), the number of prevalent cases can be estimated indirectly as the number of incident cases per unit time times the average duration of disease. This formula, however, is based on a steady-state assumption which is often unrealistic, potentially precluding use of this indirect approach. Methods: We derive and illustrate use of an alternative formula relating numbers of prevalent cases, numbers of incident cases over time, the average disease duration and the mean square duration. Results: Examples illustrate use of our formula and that results are somewhat robust to the number of time periods used to estimate the linear trend in case incidence. Conclusion: Our formula does not require a steady-state assumption and applies provided temporal changes in incident cases are approximately linear.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000002049
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Indirect Estimation of the Number of Prevalent Cases – Relaxing the Steady State Assumption

W. Dana Flanders, Michael Goodman, Cathy Lally
Epidemiology
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

Indirect Estimation of the Number of Prevalent Cases – Relaxing the Steady State Assumption

W. Dana Flanders, Michael Goodman, Cathy Lally
article en

Abstract

Background: Prevalence is an important measure of disease frequency, helping characterize disease burden and health care needs. If direct estimates are unavailable (e.g. from surveys), the number of prevalent cases can be estimated indirectly as the number of incident cases per unit time times the average duration of disease. This formula, however, is based on a steady-state assumption which is often unrealistic, potentially precluding use of this indirect approach. Methods: We derive and illustrate use of an alternative formula relating numbers of prevalent cases, numbers of incident cases over time, the average disease duration and the mean square duration. Results: Examples illustrate use of our formula and that results are somewhat robust to the number of time periods used to estimate the linear trend in case incidence. Conclusion: Our formula does not require a steady-state assumption and applies provided temporal changes in incident cases are approximately linear.

Epidemiology
Emory University (US), Georgia Department of Public Health (US), Methodist University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Indirect Estimation of the Number of Prevalent Cases – Relaxing the Steady State Assumption — W. Dana Flanders, Michael Goodman, et al. · Epidemiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS