Structural change of cooperative federations: The role of economic justification and asset specificity

Since the 1960s, agricultural cooperatives have pursued strategic growth through federations, yet this model has come under increasing pressure since the 1990s. Building on the lifecycle approach of cooperatives and recent insights from corporate governance and new institutional economics, a common combination grounded in the dual nature of cooperative members as both users and owners, we examine the trade-off between the governance advantages of federations of local cooperatives and those of centralised cooperatives. In federation, local cooperatives have the capacity and the incentive to engage in cooperative governance. In centralised cooperatives, potential internal conflicts related to the use and returns of specific assets are more readily solved. Consequently, while federation is an effective governance structure, investment in specific assets tends to drive centralisation. From this logic, we propose a framework based on the interplay of the economic justification to cooperate and asset specificity to analyse cooperative structural changes. Applied to six French cases, it reveals mechanisms that sustain federation stability or drive their evolution through centralisation, dissociation, or defensive mergers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2026.100304
Primary Topic
Cooperative Studies and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Structural change of cooperative federations: The role of economic justification and asset specificity

Julien Cadot, Francis Declerck, Michael L. Cook, Philippe Jeanneaux
Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management
Cooperative Studies and Economics
article

Structural change of cooperative federations: The role of economic justification and asset specificity

Julien Cadot, Francis Declerck, Michael L. Cook, Philippe Jeanneaux
article en

Abstract

Since the 1960s, agricultural cooperatives have pursued strategic growth through federations, yet this model has come under increasing pressure since the 1990s. Building on the lifecycle approach of cooperatives and recent insights from corporate governance and new institutional economics, a common combination grounded in the dual nature of cooperative members as both users and owners, we examine the trade-off between the governance advantages of federations of local cooperatives and those of centralised cooperatives. In federation, local cooperatives have the capacity and the incentive to engage in cooperative governance. In centralised cooperatives, potential internal conflicts related to the use and returns of specific assets are more readily solved. Consequently, while federation is an effective governance structure, investment in specific assets tends to drive centralisation. From this logic, we propose a framework based on the interplay of the economic justification to cooperate and asset specificity to analyse cooperative structural changes. Applied to six French cases, it reveals mechanisms that sustain federation stability or drive their evolution through centralisation, dissociation, or defensive mergers.

Journal of Co-operative Organization and ManagementVol. 14(2)
École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (FR), VetAgro Sup (FR), Délégation Paris 6 (FR), University of Missouri (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cooperative Studies and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.