Recovering ecosystems as well as their constituent parts

Conservation regulation largely focuses on protecting threatened species and habitats, yet biodiversity loss continues at alarming rates. Existing regulatory frameworks for nature are insufficient to address the root causes of nature decline, without coupled mechanisms that restore the dynamic ecological and evolutionary processes through which nature itself can thrive and respond to global change. Using the UK as a case study, we examine options to embed ‘process-based approaches’ in nature conservation policy. These approaches support nature in a different way by maintaining evolution, movement, interactions, and biogeochemical cycling to support ecosystem functions and properties. We identify eight recent pioneering examples from terrestrial and marine realms, including the District Level Licensing and Nutrient Neutrality Schemes, Protected Sites Strategies and Ecosystem-Based Management. Our examples demonstrate the plurality of mechanisms through which process-based conservation can operate at larger landscape or seascape scales. Adopting process-based approaches requires careful navigation of trade‑offs in local contexts, to avoid undermining protection of threatened species and habitats. We derive four principles that can enable process-based conservation to work effectively alongside species and habitat protection for long-term ecological recovery anywhere in the world.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.134369
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Recovering ecosystems as well as their constituent parts

Lynn V. Dicks, Clare Fitzsimmons, Sallie Bailey
Apollo
Environmental Conservation and Management
article

Recovering ecosystems as well as their constituent parts

Lynn V. Dicks, Clare Fitzsimmons, Sallie Bailey
article en

Abstract

Conservation regulation largely focuses on protecting threatened species and habitats, yet biodiversity loss continues at alarming rates. Existing regulatory frameworks for nature are insufficient to address the root causes of nature decline, without coupled mechanisms that restore the dynamic ecological and evolutionary processes through which nature itself can thrive and respond to global change. Using the UK as a case study, we examine options to embed ‘process-based approaches’ in nature conservation policy. These approaches support nature in a different way by maintaining evolution, movement, interactions, and biogeochemical cycling to support ecosystem functions and properties. We identify eight recent pioneering examples from terrestrial and marine realms, including the District Level Licensing and Nutrient Neutrality Schemes, Protected Sites Strategies and Ecosystem-Based Management. Our examples demonstrate the plurality of mechanisms through which process-based conservation can operate at larger landscape or seascape scales. Adopting process-based approaches requires careful navigation of trade‑offs in local contexts, to avoid undermining protection of threatened species and habitats. We derive four principles that can enable process-based conservation to work effectively alongside species and habitat protection for long-term ecological recovery anywhere in the world.

Apollo
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental Conservation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.