Artificial Intelligence in Endometriosis Management: A Guideline-Concordance Study

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate how closely artificial intelligence (AI)- generated clinical recommendations correspond with established international guidelines for endometriosis management, using structured clinical scenarios.Methods: This study assessed the consistency of AI-generated responses with the 2022 ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline. Fifteen predefined clinical scenarios were designed to reflect the main areas of endometriosis management. Each scenario was submitted using a standardized prompt to ensure consistency. AI responses were evaluated using predefined guideline-based assessment matrices to determine concordance and to explore performance differences across clinical domains.Results: A total of 45 AI-generated responses across 15 clinical scenarios were evaluated. Overall concordance with ESHRE guideline-based reference answers was 93.3% (42/45). Diagnostic scenarios demonstrated 88.9% concordance, while medical management, surgical/multidisciplinary, and high-risk scenarios demonstrated 100% concordance. Fertility-related scenarios showed 83.3% concordance. Complete inter-run consistency was observed in 13 of 15 scenarios (86.7%), with variability limited to Cases 2 and 3. Fleiss’ kappa indicated a high level of inter-run agreement within the evaluated scenarios (κ = 0.831; 95% CI, 0.583–1.000).Conclusion: Artificial intelligence systems show meaningful alignment with evidence-based guidance in fundamental aspects of endometriosis management. However, variability in complex scenarios reveals important limitations. Although AI tools may support education or serve as an adjunct in clinical decision-making, they cannot replace expert clinical judgment in specialized gynecologic care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cerasus journal of medicine.
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70058/cjm.1973205
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Artificial Intelligence in Endometriosis Management: A Guideline-Concordance Study

Ezgi Darıcı, Emine Karabük, Miray Nilüfer Cimşit Kemahlı, Mehmet Faruk Köse
Cerasus journal of medicine.
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

Artificial Intelligence in Endometriosis Management: A Guideline-Concordance Study

Ezgi Darıcı, Emine Karabük, Miray Nilüfer Cimşit Kemahlı, Mehmet Faruk Köse
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate how closely artificial intelligence (AI)- generated clinical recommendations correspond with established international guidelines for endometriosis management, using structured clinical scenarios.Methods: This study assessed the consistency of AI-generated responses with the 2022 ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline. Fifteen predefined clinical scenarios were designed to reflect the main areas of endometriosis management. Each scenario was submitted using a standardized prompt to ensure consistency. AI responses were evaluated using predefined guideline-based assessment matrices to determine concordance and to explore performance differences across clinical domains.Results: A total of 45 AI-generated responses across 15 clinical scenarios were evaluated. Overall concordance with ESHRE guideline-based reference answers was 93.3% (42/45). Diagnostic scenarios demonstrated 88.9% concordance, while medical management, surgical/multidisciplinary, and high-risk scenarios demonstrated 100% concordance. Fertility-related scenarios showed 83.3% concordance. Complete inter-run consistency was observed in 13 of 15 scenarios (86.7%), with variability limited to Cases 2 and 3. Fleiss’ kappa indicated a high level of inter-run agreement within the evaluated scenarios (κ = 0.831; 95% CI, 0.583–1.000).Conclusion: Artificial intelligence systems show meaningful alignment with evidence-based guidance in fundamental aspects of endometriosis management. However, variability in complex scenarios reveals important limitations. Although AI tools may support education or serve as an adjunct in clinical decision-making, they cannot replace expert clinical judgment in specialized gynecologic care.

Cerasus journal of medicine.(Advanced Online Publication)
Semmelweis University (HU), Acıbadem University (TR), Universidad Panamericana (GT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.