Intrusion Detection for Agentic Processes: Evidence-Based Runtime Monitoring

Agent deployments increasingly combine language-model inference with retrieval, delegation, tool execution, external-system access, and human approval. Security-relevant deviations can therefore emerge across an evolving process rather than in one isolated input or action. Building on the author’s earlier product- and vendor-neutral black-box architecture for agentic processes and the subsequent evidence-claim model, this paper proposes an Agentic-Process Intrusion Detection System (A-IDS), an evidence-aware security interpretation layer for runtime intrusion detection whose monitored object is the agentic process itself. A-IDS compares evidence-supported observations with an explicitly governed and versioned expectation baseline for workflow state, authorization, communication, and mandatory events. Its conceptual contribution combines dynamically due governed expectations, visibility separated from three-valued matching, explicit unresolved observation states, and bounded findings that separate evidentiary status from operational impact. The model further identifies the monitoring plane itself as an attack surface when adversarial content reaches semantic evidence producers through otherwise legitimate observation paths. Some observations may be produced outside the operational agent’s self-report path, but the model does not assume complete observability or universally trustworthy capture. Prompt injection is treated not only as an input-security problem but also as a possible origin of later process deviations and cross-agent influence paths. A-IDS does not infer malicious intent from anomalous behavior, does not treat an unobserved event as proof of non-occurrence, and does not claim a new anomaly detector, temporal logic, or provenance model. The contribution is conceptual: it does not validate a particular implementation, demonstrate empirical detection performance, establish causal attribution, or provide an enforcement mechanism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22764609
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Intrusion Detection for Agentic Processes: Evidence-Based Runtime Monitoring

Arslan Brömme
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
preprint

Intrusion Detection for Agentic Processes: Evidence-Based Runtime Monitoring

Arslan Brömme
preprint en

Abstract

Agent deployments increasingly combine language-model inference with retrieval, delegation, tool execution, external-system access, and human approval. Security-relevant deviations can therefore emerge across an evolving process rather than in one isolated input or action. Building on the author’s earlier product- and vendor-neutral black-box architecture for agentic processes and the subsequent evidence-claim model, this paper proposes an Agentic-Process Intrusion Detection System (A-IDS), an evidence-aware security interpretation layer for runtime intrusion detection whose monitored object is the agentic process itself. A-IDS compares evidence-supported observations with an explicitly governed and versioned expectation baseline for workflow state, authorization, communication, and mandatory events. Its conceptual contribution combines dynamically due governed expectations, visibility separated from three-valued matching, explicit unresolved observation states, and bounded findings that separate evidentiary status from operational impact. The model further identifies the monitoring plane itself as an attack surface when adversarial content reaches semantic evidence producers through otherwise legitimate observation paths. Some observations may be produced outside the operational agent’s self-report path, but the model does not assume complete observability or universally trustworthy capture. Prompt injection is treated not only as an input-security problem but also as a possible origin of later process deviations and cross-agent influence paths. A-IDS does not infer malicious intent from anomalous behavior, does not treat an unobserved event as proof of non-occurrence, and does not claim a new anomaly detector, temporal logic, or provenance model. The contribution is conceptual: it does not validate a particular implementation, demonstrate empirical detection performance, establish causal attribution, or provide an enforcement mechanism.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intrusion Detection for Agentic Processes: Evidence-Based Runtime Monitoring — Arslan Brömme · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS