Can Structured Detention Screening Reduce Admissions to the Juvenile Legal System?: Evaluating the Impact of the Detention Assessment Tool (DAT)

Aligning with our increased focus on juvenile rehabilitation, actuarial assessment tools have been implemented across the juvenile legal system. While post-conviction tools are intended to identify needs and reduce recidivism, the primary goal of pretrial assessment tools is to reduce detention admissions while maintaining public safety. However, a limited number of research evaluations to date have assessed if juvenile pretrial assessment tools reduce detention admissions. The current study assesses if the implementation of the Detention Assessment Tool (DAT; implemented in two-phases) reduced detention admissions in North Carolina from 2004-2024. The current study revealed that the DAT 1.0 was associated with immediate reductions in detention admissions ( b = −5.230, p < 0.001), the effects of which were sustained from 2012-2020. Between county variation on detention admissions was observed, suggesting that targeted engagement with juvenile legal system officials to increase fidelity to assessment implementation could further reduce the amount of youth admitted to pretrial detention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040261489536
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Can Structured Detention Screening Reduce Admissions to the Juvenile Legal System?: Evaluating the Impact of the Detention Assessment Tool (DAT)

Ian A. Silver, Debbie Dawes, Stephen Tueller, Sarah Philbrick et al.
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Can Structured Detention Screening Reduce Admissions to the Juvenile Legal System?: Evaluating the Impact of the Detention Assessment Tool (DAT)

Ian A. Silver, Debbie Dawes, Stephen Tueller, Sarah Philbrick, Marianne Kluckman
article en

Abstract

Aligning with our increased focus on juvenile rehabilitation, actuarial assessment tools have been implemented across the juvenile legal system. While post-conviction tools are intended to identify needs and reduce recidivism, the primary goal of pretrial assessment tools is to reduce detention admissions while maintaining public safety. However, a limited number of research evaluations to date have assessed if juvenile pretrial assessment tools reduce detention admissions. The current study assesses if the implementation of the Detention Assessment Tool (DAT; implemented in two-phases) reduced detention admissions in North Carolina from 2004-2024. The current study revealed that the DAT 1.0 was associated with immediate reductions in detention admissions ( b = −5.230, p < 0.001), the effects of which were sustained from 2012-2020. Between county variation on detention admissions was observed, suggesting that targeted engagement with juvenile legal system officials to increase fidelity to assessment implementation could further reduce the amount of youth admitted to pretrial detention.

Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
RTI International (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Structured Detention Screening Reduce Admissions to the Juvenile Legal System?: Evaluating the Impact of the Detention Assessment Tool (DAT) — Ian A. Silver, Debbie Dawes, et al. · Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS