Benchmarking of the CMS5 Code System for the NEA/OECD Watts Bar Unit 1 Multi-Cycle Depletion Problem

The Studsvik Core Management System CMS5, consisting of the CASMO5 lattice physics code and the SIMULATE5 three-dimensional nodal simulator, was evaluated against the Nuclear Enersy Agency/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority) Watts Bar Unit 1 Multi-Physics Multi-Cycle Depletion benchmark. The assessment included cycle 1 zero-power physics tests and full-power boron letdown and flux map comparisons for cycles 1, 2, and 3, using plant measurements as the primary validation basis and continuous-energy Monte Carlo reference solutions for complementary verification.The impact of the evaluated nuclear data was investigated using CASMO5 libraries based on ENDF/B-VII.0, ENDF/B-VII.1, and ENDF/B-VIII.1. Transitioning from the ENDF/B-VII.1- to the ENDF/B-VIII.1-based library resulted in a systematic increase in the predicted critical boron concentration, corresponding to a reactivity shift of approximately 114 pcm. In contrast, the control bank worth, reactivity coefficients, boron letdown, and flux map root-mean-square deviations showed only limited sensitivity to the selected library.Overall, the CMS5 predictions showed consistent agreement with both the plant measurements and continuous-energy Monte Carlo reference solutions, indicating reliable multicycle core predictions, with the primary impact of the evaluated nuclear data confined to absolute reactivity predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2026.2724788
Primary Topic
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Benchmarking of the CMS5 Code System for the NEA/OECD Watts Bar Unit 1 Multi-Cycle Depletion Problem

Tamer Bahadir, Emiliya Georgieva
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
article

Benchmarking of the CMS5 Code System for the NEA/OECD Watts Bar Unit 1 Multi-Cycle Depletion Problem

Tamer Bahadir, Emiliya Georgieva
article en

Abstract

The Studsvik Core Management System CMS5, consisting of the CASMO5 lattice physics code and the SIMULATE5 three-dimensional nodal simulator, was evaluated against the Nuclear Enersy Agency/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority) Watts Bar Unit 1 Multi-Physics Multi-Cycle Depletion benchmark. The assessment included cycle 1 zero-power physics tests and full-power boron letdown and flux map comparisons for cycles 1, 2, and 3, using plant measurements as the primary validation basis and continuous-energy Monte Carlo reference solutions for complementary verification.The impact of the evaluated nuclear data was investigated using CASMO5 libraries based on ENDF/B-VII.0, ENDF/B-VII.1, and ENDF/B-VIII.1. Transitioning from the ENDF/B-VII.1- to the ENDF/B-VIII.1-based library resulted in a systematic increase in the predicted critical boron concentration, corresponding to a reactivity shift of approximately 114 pcm. In contrast, the control bank worth, reactivity coefficients, boron letdown, and flux map root-mean-square deviations showed only limited sensitivity to the selected library.Overall, the CMS5 predictions showed consistent agreement with both the plant measurements and continuous-energy Monte Carlo reference solutions, indicating reliable multicycle core predictions, with the primary impact of the evaluated nuclear data confined to absolute reactivity predictions.

Nuclear Science and Engineering
Studsvik (Sweden) (SE), Studsvik (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.