Devotional AI: digital companions and bad faith love

Abstract In romantic love, partners come together as a “we”. They share their projects, plans, lives, and love. As consumer AI chatbots like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini find wider adoption, a growing number of users report falling in love with them. Is it possible to experience a loving “we” with an AI bot? In considering this question, we bracket questions about AI consciousness and instead examine the structure of human–AI relationships. Drawing on Beauvoir’s critique of romantic love, we argue that AI companions cannot emulate the role an authentic “we” requires. What they perform is not love but devotion —and the user, cast as an idolized Other, is positioned to experience inauthentic love. The resulting “we” is asymmetric: less a union than an enlarged “I”. So, while experiencing love for an AI companion may be empowering and even precious, it is, at base, a bad faith love.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-026-10211-w
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Devotional AI: digital companions and bad faith love

Joel Krueger, Lucy Osler
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
AI in Service Interactions
article

Devotional AI: digital companions and bad faith love

Joel Krueger, Lucy Osler
article en

Abstract

Abstract In romantic love, partners come together as a “we”. They share their projects, plans, lives, and love. As consumer AI chatbots like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini find wider adoption, a growing number of users report falling in love with them. Is it possible to experience a loving “we” with an AI bot? In considering this question, we bracket questions about AI consciousness and instead examine the structure of human–AI relationships. Drawing on Beauvoir’s critique of romantic love, we argue that AI companions cannot emulate the role an authentic “we” requires. What they perform is not love but devotion —and the user, cast as an idolized Other, is positioned to experience inauthentic love. The resulting “we” is asymmetric: less a union than an enlarged “I”. So, while experiencing love for an AI companion may be empowering and even precious, it is, at base, a bad faith love.

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Devotional AI: digital companions and bad faith love — Joel Krueger, Lucy Osler · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS