A curated structural dataset of peptide–protein complexes reveals biases in existing datasets and principles of peptide binding

Peptide-protein interactions are fundamental to many biological processes, and peptide design is gaining interest due to its therapeutic potential. This has led to the emergence of various structural databases, such as PepBDB and Peptipedia, that classify peptides as polypeptides with fewer than 50 amino acids. These databases provide valuable starting points for studying peptide recognition by protein partners and are widely used for machine learning applications, docking, and scoring functions. However, under such a length definition for peptides, we have very different cases that are likely to confound the analysis of peptide binding, including miniproteins, peptide-peptide complexes, intramolecular peptide disulfide bonds, intermolecular disulfide bridges, and proteins undergoing internal cleavage, such as serpins, as well as non-natural amino acids and covalently bound cofactors. Here, we present a rigorous classification of peptide-protein complexes to generate datasets suitable for comparative energetic analysis with a focus on peptides that are unstructured in the absence of their target protein. The analysis of this dataset shows that peptide binding is typically driven by a small number of hotspot residues mainly enriched in aromatic and bulky hydrophobic side chains. Their number of hotspots and their spatial organization depend on peptide length, secondary structure, and covalent constraints. Short peptides rely on central anchor regions, whereas longer peptides distribute hotspots more broadly, with helices showing periodic spacing and β-strands relying more on backbone-mediated stabilization. Disulfide bonds further decrease the number of hotspots per peptide length by either pre-organizing the peptide or acting as covalent anchors. This work provides a curated resource and general principles for peptide recognition. It highlights the importance of structurally classifying peptide-protein complexes to avoid bias in downstream computational and machine-learning applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Protein Science
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70779
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A curated structural dataset of peptide–protein complexes reveals biases in existing datasets and principles of peptide binding

Luís Serrano, Javier Delgado, Rahma Hamdani
Protein Science
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
article

A curated structural dataset of peptide–protein complexes reveals biases in existing datasets and principles of peptide binding

Luís Serrano, Javier Delgado, Rahma Hamdani
article en

Abstract

Peptide-protein interactions are fundamental to many biological processes, and peptide design is gaining interest due to its therapeutic potential. This has led to the emergence of various structural databases, such as PepBDB and Peptipedia, that classify peptides as polypeptides with fewer than 50 amino acids. These databases provide valuable starting points for studying peptide recognition by protein partners and are widely used for machine learning applications, docking, and scoring functions. However, under such a length definition for peptides, we have very different cases that are likely to confound the analysis of peptide binding, including miniproteins, peptide-peptide complexes, intramolecular peptide disulfide bonds, intermolecular disulfide bridges, and proteins undergoing internal cleavage, such as serpins, as well as non-natural amino acids and covalently bound cofactors. Here, we present a rigorous classification of peptide-protein complexes to generate datasets suitable for comparative energetic analysis with a focus on peptides that are unstructured in the absence of their target protein. The analysis of this dataset shows that peptide binding is typically driven by a small number of hotspot residues mainly enriched in aromatic and bulky hydrophobic side chains. Their number of hotspots and their spatial organization depend on peptide length, secondary structure, and covalent constraints. Short peptides rely on central anchor regions, whereas longer peptides distribute hotspots more broadly, with helices showing periodic spacing and β-strands relying more on backbone-mediated stabilization. Disulfide bonds further decrease the number of hotspots per peptide length by either pre-organizing the peptide or acting as covalent anchors. This work provides a curated resource and general principles for peptide recognition. It highlights the importance of structurally classifying peptide-protein complexes to avoid bias in downstream computational and machine-learning applications.

Protein ScienceVol. 35(10)
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (ES), Centre for Genomic Regulation (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.