Occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of follicular lymphoma: Family case-control study

INTRODUCTION: Concerns persist regarding possible associations of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) and cancer risk. Few studies have examined the association between occupational exposure to RF-EMF and the risk of follicular lymphoma (FL). Existing research has typically assessed FL in combination with other lymphomas and has suboptimal exposure assessment. We investigated the possible association between occupational RF-EMF exposure and FL in a family-based case-control study using improved exposure metrics. METHODS: The study population consisted of 727 FL cases and 484 family controls. Exposure to RF-EMF was estimated using self-reported lifetime occupational histories and exposure intensity rating from the INTEROCC job-exposure matrix (JEM) (separately for electric and magnetic fields) and the CANJEM. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from logistic regression models. RESULTS: We observed no consistent associations between RF-EMF exposure and FL. For the highest compared to the lowest quartile of lifetime exposure, results using the INTEROCC JEM showed an OR of 0.98 (95%CI: 0.68-1.40) for electric fields and OR of 1.02 (95%CI: 0.72-1.46) for magnetic fields. RF-EMF exposure defined using the CANJEM showed an OR of 0.94 (95%CI: 0.68-1.31). There were also no consistent associations when applying latency periods or time windows. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support any consistent association between occupational RF-EMF exposure and risk of developing FL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2026.103233
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of follicular lymphoma: Family case-control study

E. Verner, S. Opat, M.J. Abramson, C.M. Vajdic et al.
Cancer Epidemiology
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
article

Occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of follicular lymphoma: Family case-control study

E. Verner, S. Opat, M.J. Abramson, C.M. Vajdic, H.M. Prince, M. Hertzberg, F. Roncolato, M. Odutola, R. Lindeman, S.P. Loughran, M.T. Van Leeuwen, K. Karipidis, M.C. Turner, S. Milliken, R. Mate, F. Bruinsma, M. Turuban, G. Benke, E. Cardis, J.F. Seymour
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Concerns persist regarding possible associations of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) and cancer risk. Few studies have examined the association between occupational exposure to RF-EMF and the risk of follicular lymphoma (FL). Existing research has typically assessed FL in combination with other lymphomas and has suboptimal exposure assessment. We investigated the possible association between occupational RF-EMF exposure and FL in a family-based case-control study using improved exposure metrics. METHODS: The study population consisted of 727 FL cases and 484 family controls. Exposure to RF-EMF was estimated using self-reported lifetime occupational histories and exposure intensity rating from the INTEROCC job-exposure matrix (JEM) (separately for electric and magnetic fields) and the CANJEM. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from logistic regression models. RESULTS: We observed no consistent associations between RF-EMF exposure and FL. For the highest compared to the lowest quartile of lifetime exposure, results using the INTEROCC JEM showed an OR of 0.98 (95%CI: 0.68-1.40) for electric fields and OR of 1.02 (95%CI: 0.72-1.46) for magnetic fields. RF-EMF exposure defined using the CANJEM showed an OR of 0.94 (95%CI: 0.68-1.31). There were also no consistent associations when applying latency periods or time windows. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support any consistent association between occupational RF-EMF exposure and risk of developing FL.

Cancer EpidemiologyVol. 105
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Cancer Council Victoria (AU), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Australian Government (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), Prince of Wales Hospital (AU), Albury Wodonga Health (AU), Monash Health (AU), St George Hospital (AU), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES), Act Health (AU), Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Monash University (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.