Resting-state functional connectivity changes and pretreatment features associated with symptom improvement after cognitive behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa

{"Bulimia":[0,352],"nervosa":[1,353],"(BN)":[2],"is":[3,13,354,374,550],"a":[4,355,517,521],"serious":[5,356],"eating":[6,357],"disorder,":[7],"and":[8,22,40,86,99,119,129,141,145,171,216,230,233,241,260,265,271,301,315,338,363,398,417,444,477,482,499,524,543],"cognitive":[9,316],"behavioral":[10],"therapy":[11,393,430,510],"(CBT)":[12,373],"the":[14,23,90,191,212,224,237,255,267,375,395,525,530],"first-line":[15],"treatment;":[16],"however,":[17],"remission":[18],"rates":[19],"remain":[20],"modest,":[21],"neural":[24],"correlates":[25,42],"of":[26,43,104,113,381,503],"CBT":[27,67,322],"response":[28],"are":[29,52],"unclear.":[30],"Resting-state":[31,84],"functional":[32],"connectivity":[33,308,455],"(rsFC)":[34],"may":[35,288,318],"clarify":[36],"CBT-related":[37],"brain":[38,410,438,454,497],"changes":[39,144,294,394,434],"pretreatment":[41,130,147,252],"response,":[44],"yet":[45],"longitudinal":[46,279],"whole-brain":[47],"rsFC":[48,116,143,210,222,235,293],"studies":[49,549],"in":[50,137,202,295,298,309,341,435,441,468,546],"BN":[51,58],"lacking.":[53],"Thirty":[54],"Japanese":[55],"women":[56,415],"with":[57,101,208,250,291,433,461],"(mean":[59],"age,":[60],"33.6":[61],"±":[62,106],"9.9":[63],"years)":[64],"received":[65],"multi-site":[66],"(enhanced":[68],"CBT:":[69,74,80],"n":[70,75,81],"=":[71,76,82],"24;":[72],"videoconference":[73],"4;":[77],"guided":[78],"internet-based":[79],"2).":[83],"fMRI":[85],"symptom":[87,283,426,463],"measures,":[88],"including":[89],"Eating":[91],"Disorder":[92],"Examination":[93],"Questionnaire":[94],"(EDE-Q),":[95],"were":[96,459,467],"obtained":[97],"pre-":[98],"post-treatment,":[100],"an":[102],"interval":[103],"5.6":[105],"1.5":[107],"months":[108],"between":[109,135,211,223,236,254,266,437],"assessments.":[110],"Whole-brain":[111],"region":[112],"interest":[114],"(ROI)-to-ROI":[115],"was":[117,150,206,248,431,516],"computed":[118],"harmonized":[120],"across":[121,160,179,190],"sites.":[122],"Multiple":[123],"regression":[124],"analyses":[125],"adjusting":[126],"for":[127,403,471,534],"age":[128],"psychotropic":[131],"medication":[132],"examined":[133],"associations":[134,185],"improvement":[136,201,247,284,427],"EDE-Q":[138,203],"global":[139,204],"score":[140,205],"(1)":[142],"(2)":[146],"rsFC.":[148],"Significance":[149],"assessed":[151],"using":[152],"seed-level":[153,196],"FDR":[154,173,188,336],"correction":[155,174,189,337,533],"(q":[156,175],"<":[157,176],"0.05),":[158,177],"applied":[159,178],"all":[161,168,180],"connections":[162],"from":[163,509],"each":[164],"seed":[165],"ROI":[166],"to":[167,312,321,390,412],"target":[169,494],"ROIs,":[170],"analysis-level":[172,187,335],"tested":[181],"ROI-to-ROI":[182,192,292],"connections.":[183],"No":[184],"survived":[186],"feature":[193],"set.":[194],"Exploratory":[195],"findings":[197,325,526],"indicated":[198],"that":[199,282,425,452,491],"greater":[200],"associated":[207,249,290,432,460],"decreased":[209],"right":[213,217,225,238,242,256],"orbitofrontal":[214],"cortex":[215,229],"posterior":[218],"supramarginal":[219],"gyrus,":[220],"increased":[221,234],"anterior":[226],"temporal":[227,263,275],"fusiform":[228],"cerebellar":[231,243],"regions,":[232,264],"caudate":[239],"nucleus":[240],"hemisphere":[244],"IX.":[245],"Greater":[246],"stronger":[251],"rsFCs":[253],"superior":[257],"parietal":[258],"lobule":[259],"inferior":[261,274],"frontal/temporo-occipital":[262],"left":[268],"postcentral":[269],"gyrus":[270],"bilateral":[272],"temporo-occipital":[273],"gyri.":[276],"This":[277],"exploratory":[278],"analysis":[280],"suggests":[281],"following":[285,428],"CBT-based":[286,429],"treatment":[287,458],"be":[289,319,327,540],"regions":[296,310,439,498],"implicated":[297],"reward":[299,442],"processing":[300,314],"higher-order":[302],"visual":[303,447],"or":[304,446],"affective":[305],"processing.":[306,448],"Pretreatment":[307],"related":[311],"somatosensory":[313],"control":[317,445,522],"relevant":[320],"responsiveness.":[323],"These":[324,465],"should":[326,539],"interpreted":[328],"cautiously":[329],"because":[330,514],"they":[331,419],"did":[332,527],"not":[333,528],"survive":[334,529],"require":[339],"replication":[340],"larger":[342,547],"controlled":[343,548],"cohorts.":[344],"Trial":[345],"registration:":[346],"UMIN000039841.":[347],"Registered":[348],"18":[349],"March":[350],"2020.":[351],"disorder":[358],"involving":[359],"binge":[360],"eating,":[361],"purging,":[362],"intense":[364],"concerns":[365],"about":[366,379],"body":[367],"shape.":[368],"While":[369],"Cognitive":[370],"Behavioral":[371],"Therapy":[372],"leading":[376],"treatment,":[377],"only":[378],"half":[380],"patients":[382,506],"achieve":[383],"full":[384],"recovery.":[385],"We":[386,408,449],"conducted":[387],"this":[388,485,515],"study":[389,519],"understand":[391],"how":[392,472,478],"brain’s":[396],"\\"wiring\\"":[397],"why":[399,504],"it":[400],"works":[401],"better":[402],"some":[404,453,505],"people":[405],"than":[406,511],"others.":[407,512],"used":[409],"scans":[411],"monitor":[413],"30":[414],"before":[416,457],"after":[418],"completed":[420],"therapy.":[421],"Our":[422],"results":[423,538],"suggested":[424],"communication":[436],"involved":[440],"valuation":[443],"also":[450],"found":[451],"patterns":[456,466],"later":[462],"improvement.":[464],"areas":[469],"responsible":[470],"we":[473,479],"perceive":[474],"our":[475,501],"bodies":[476],"exercise":[480],"learning":[481],"self-control.":[483],"Ultimately,":[484],"could":[486],"help":[487],"develop":[488],"new":[489],"treatments":[490],"more":[492,508],"effectively":[493],"these":[495,537],"specific":[496],"improve":[500],"understanding":[502],"benefit":[507],"However,":[513],"small":[518],"without":[520],"group":[523],"most":[531],"conservative":[532],"multiple":[535],"comparisons,":[536],"considered":[541],"preliminary":[542],"further":[544],"validation":[545],"needed.":[551]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-026-01754-z
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Resting-state functional connectivity changes and pretreatment features associated with symptom improvement after cognitive behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa

Satoru Ide, Yasuhiro Sato, Ritu Bhusal Chhatkuli, Junko Ota et al.
Journal of Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Resting-state functional connectivity changes and pretreatment features associated with symptom improvement after cognitive behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa

Satoru Ide, Yasuhiro Sato, Ritu Bhusal Chhatkuli, Junko Ota, Yoshiyuki Hirano, Yumi Hamamoto, Sayo Hamatani, Tsunehiko Takamura, Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi, Rio Kamashita, Yusuke Sudo, Kazufumi Yoshihara, Koichiro Futatsuya, Eiji Shimizu, Noriko Numata, Nobuhiro Nohara, Kentaro Oba, Chisato Ohara, Shin Fukudo, Michiko Nakazato, Lu Yu, Keiko Ino, Momoka Taniguchi, Momo Sunada, Tetsuya Ando, Misako Funaba, Yichen Yang, Jeyoon Choi, Motoharu Gondo, EDNI Working Group, Yoshiya Moriguchi, Yuko Isobe, Koji Matsumoto, Tokiko Yoshida, Naoki Kodama, Motoaki Sugiura, Kazumasa Okada, Ruri Katsunuma, Wakako Nakano, Keima Tose, Shu Takakura, Tomomi Noda, Atsushi Sekiguchi, Toshiya Murai, Kana Morimoto, Masanori Isobe, Masatoshi Takahashi
article en

Abstract

Bulimia nervosa (BN) is a serious eating disorder, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the first-line treatment; however, remission rates remain modest, and the neural correlates of CBT response are unclear. Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) may clarify CBT-related brain changes and pretreatment correlates of response, yet longitudinal whole-brain rsFC studies in BN are lacking. Thirty Japanese women with BN (mean age, 33.6 ± 9.9 years) received multi-site CBT (enhanced CBT: n = 24; videoconference CBT: n = 4; guided internet-based CBT: n = 2). Resting-state fMRI and symptom measures, including the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), were obtained pre- and post-treatment, with an interval of 5.6 ± 1.5 months between assessments. Whole-brain region of interest (ROI)-to-ROI rsFC was computed and harmonized across sites. Multiple regression analyses adjusting for age and pretreatment psychotropic medication examined associations between improvement in EDE-Q global score and (1) rsFC changes and (2) pretreatment rsFC. Significance was assessed using seed-level FDR correction (q < 0.05), applied across all connections from each seed ROI to all target ROIs, and analysis-level FDR correction (q < 0.05), applied across all tested ROI-to-ROI connections. No associations survived analysis-level FDR correction across the ROI-to-ROI feature set. Exploratory seed-level findings indicated that greater improvement in EDE-Q global score was associated with decreased rsFC between the right orbitofrontal cortex and right posterior supramarginal gyrus, increased rsFC between the right anterior temporal fusiform cortex and cerebellar regions, and increased rsFC between the right caudate nucleus and right cerebellar hemisphere IX. Greater improvement was associated with stronger pretreatment rsFCs between the right superior parietal lobule and inferior frontal/temporo-occipital temporal regions, and between the left postcentral gyrus and bilateral temporo-occipital inferior temporal gyri. This exploratory longitudinal analysis suggests that symptom improvement following CBT-based treatment may be associated with ROI-to-ROI rsFC changes in regions implicated in reward processing and higher-order visual or affective processing. Pretreatment connectivity in regions related to somatosensory processing and cognitive control may be relevant to CBT responsiveness. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because they did not survive analysis-level FDR correction and require replication in larger controlled cohorts. Trial registration: UMIN000039841. Registered 18 March 2020. Bulimia nervosa is a serious eating disorder involving binge eating, purging, and intense concerns about body shape. While Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is the leading treatment, only about half of patients achieve full recovery. We conducted this study to understand how therapy changes the brain’s "wiring" and why it works better for some people than others. We used brain scans to monitor 30 women before and after they completed therapy. Our results suggested that symptom improvement following CBT-based therapy was associated with changes in communication between brain regions involved in reward valuation and control or visual processing. We also found that some brain connectivity patterns before treatment were associated with later symptom improvement. These patterns were in areas responsible for how we perceive our bodies and how we exercise learning and self-control. Ultimately, this could help develop new treatments that more effectively target these specific brain regions and improve our understanding of why some patients benefit more from therapy than others. However, because this was a small study without a control group and the findings did not survive the most conservative correction for multiple comparisons, these results should be considered preliminary and further validation in larger controlled studies is needed.

Journal of Eating Disorders
University of Fukui (JP), Kyushu University (JP), Chiba University (JP), University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Tohoku University Hospital (JP), Kyushu University Hospital (JP), Chiba University Hospital (JP), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP), University of Tokyo Hospital (JP), Hiroshima Cosmopolitan University (JP), Kyoto University Hospital (JP), National Institute of Mental Health (JP), Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba University (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP), Teikyo University (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.