How does corporate ESG performance affect the return resilience of infrastructure REITs? An empirical analysis based on spatiotemporal perspective and Chinese data

This study examines the impact of corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance on the return resilience of infrastructure real estate investment trusts (Infra-REITs). Based on transaction data from 66 Chinese Infra-REITs between June 2021 and May 2025, and referencing the GRESB ESG benchmark and reporting framework, corporate ESG performance is categorized into three dimensions: Environmental Performance (E), social performance (S), and governance performance (G), encompassing 17 indicators. The optimal parameter geodetector model was employed to conduct factor detection and interaction analysis, systematically evaluating the impact mechanisms of ESG factors on Infra-REITs’ return resilience. Subsequently, ArcGIS software was used to identify differences in key factors influencing return resilience across eastern, central, and western China. The findings reveal: (1) Labor responsibility, Regional project development, and fund management capabilities are core determinants of return resilience. Project environmental and social performance exhibit significant positive correlations with Infra-REITs return resilience, whereas management performance shows weaker associations—challenging the conventional assumption of universal positive ESG effects; (2) The interactions among ESG dimensions significantly enhance the explanatory power for return resilience, particularly in the impact of Regional project development and labor responsibility on the Resistance index, as well as the influence of carbon footprint and social responsibility on the recovery index. (3) The spatial characteristics of ESG factors lead to differing emphases among Infra-REITs across regions. Infra-REIT projects in eastern regions prioritize social and governance performance, while central region projects emphasize enhancing social performance. Western region projects focus on environmental performance and fund pricing premiums driven by resource scarcity. Based on these findings, policy formulation and operational practices should adopt differentiated strategies tailored to Infra-REIT types and regional characteristics to optimize ESG performance, so as to enhance overall return resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08608-8
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

How does corporate ESG performance affect the return resilience of infrastructure REITs? An empirical analysis based on spatiotemporal perspective and Chinese data

Z.X. Yan, Xinxi Zhang, Yinglin Wang
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

How does corporate ESG performance affect the return resilience of infrastructure REITs? An empirical analysis based on spatiotemporal perspective and Chinese data

Z.X. Yan, Xinxi Zhang, Yinglin Wang
article en

Abstract

This study examines the impact of corporate ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance on the return resilience of infrastructure real estate investment trusts (Infra-REITs). Based on transaction data from 66 Chinese Infra-REITs between June 2021 and May 2025, and referencing the GRESB ESG benchmark and reporting framework, corporate ESG performance is categorized into three dimensions: Environmental Performance (E), social performance (S), and governance performance (G), encompassing 17 indicators. The optimal parameter geodetector model was employed to conduct factor detection and interaction analysis, systematically evaluating the impact mechanisms of ESG factors on Infra-REITs’ return resilience. Subsequently, ArcGIS software was used to identify differences in key factors influencing return resilience across eastern, central, and western China. The findings reveal: (1) Labor responsibility, Regional project development, and fund management capabilities are core determinants of return resilience. Project environmental and social performance exhibit significant positive correlations with Infra-REITs return resilience, whereas management performance shows weaker associations—challenging the conventional assumption of universal positive ESG effects; (2) The interactions among ESG dimensions significantly enhance the explanatory power for return resilience, particularly in the impact of Regional project development and labor responsibility on the Resistance index, as well as the influence of carbon footprint and social responsibility on the recovery index. (3) The spatial characteristics of ESG factors lead to differing emphases among Infra-REITs across regions. Infra-REIT projects in eastern regions prioritize social and governance performance, while central region projects emphasize enhancing social performance. Western region projects focus on environmental performance and fund pricing premiums driven by resource scarcity. Based on these findings, policy formulation and operational practices should adopt differentiated strategies tailored to Infra-REIT types and regional characteristics to optimize ESG performance, so as to enhance overall return resilience.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.