Candidate Spatial Niches Associated with Gastric Cancer Metastasis and Treatment Resistance: Functional Classification, Evidence Boundaries, and a Translational Framework

Gastric cancer metastasis and poor treatment responses are spatially heterogeneous; however, single-marker positivity, cellular enrichment, or simple colocalization alone is insufficient to establish a functionally meaningful spatial niche. Within this framework, “treatment resistance” encompasses primary nonresponse, reduced treatment sensitivity, insufficient local drug delivery, post-treatment residual survival, acquired resistance, and interlesional differences in therapeutic efficacy. We propose a minimum criteria chain for candidate spatial niches comprising four elements: a specified spatial context; neighborhoods characterized using prespecified and transparently reported spatial rules; local functional programs concordant with these neighborhoods; and associations with malignant phenotypes or clinical outcomes. Based on the principle of linking dominant spatial contexts with their predominant malignant functional outputs, we summarize four candidate niches within primary tumors—the invasive front–tumor–stroma interface, immune exclusion–immune evasion, hypoxia–metabolic adaptation, and perivascular supportive niches—as well as an organ-context-dependent adaptive niche-forming process at metastatic sites. The level of evidence supporting these categories varies substantially. Immune-exclusion-related spatial states currently have relatively stronger links to treatment-response cohorts; however, rigorous gastric-cancer-specific in situ validation remains limited, and no candidate niche has yet achieved full clinical validation. Invasive-front and hypoxic niches are supported primarily by pathological or mechanistic evidence, whereas evidence for perivascular niches remains limited despite emerging longitudinal treatment-response observations, and metastatic niches outside the peritoneum require stronger longitudinal, local functional, and spatial-perturbation validation. This framework aims to standardize spatial-niche terminology and evidence interpretation and guide future quantification, validation, and potential clinical translation in gastric cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cells
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15181676
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Candidate Spatial Niches Associated with Gastric Cancer Metastasis and Treatment Resistance: Functional Classification, Evidence Boundaries, and a Translational Framework

Bo Bian, Tao Jiang, Mingsi Zhang, Jingcheng Zhang et al.
Cells
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Candidate Spatial Niches Associated with Gastric Cancer Metastasis and Treatment Resistance: Functional Classification, Evidence Boundaries, and a Translational Framework

Bo Bian, Tao Jiang, Mingsi Zhang, Jingcheng Zhang, Yi Huang, Guangji Zhang, Jiaheng Lou, Taowei Gou
article en

Abstract

Gastric cancer metastasis and poor treatment responses are spatially heterogeneous; however, single-marker positivity, cellular enrichment, or simple colocalization alone is insufficient to establish a functionally meaningful spatial niche. Within this framework, “treatment resistance” encompasses primary nonresponse, reduced treatment sensitivity, insufficient local drug delivery, post-treatment residual survival, acquired resistance, and interlesional differences in therapeutic efficacy. We propose a minimum criteria chain for candidate spatial niches comprising four elements: a specified spatial context; neighborhoods characterized using prespecified and transparently reported spatial rules; local functional programs concordant with these neighborhoods; and associations with malignant phenotypes or clinical outcomes. Based on the principle of linking dominant spatial contexts with their predominant malignant functional outputs, we summarize four candidate niches within primary tumors—the invasive front–tumor–stroma interface, immune exclusion–immune evasion, hypoxia–metabolic adaptation, and perivascular supportive niches—as well as an organ-context-dependent adaptive niche-forming process at metastatic sites. The level of evidence supporting these categories varies substantially. Immune-exclusion-related spatial states currently have relatively stronger links to treatment-response cohorts; however, rigorous gastric-cancer-specific in situ validation remains limited, and no candidate niche has yet achieved full clinical validation. Invasive-front and hypoxic niches are supported primarily by pathological or mechanistic evidence, whereas evidence for perivascular niches remains limited despite emerging longitudinal treatment-response observations, and metastatic niches outside the peritoneum require stronger longitudinal, local functional, and spatial-perturbation validation. This framework aims to standardize spatial-niche terminology and evidence interpretation and guide future quantification, validation, and potential clinical translation in gastric cancer.

CellsVol. 15(18)
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.