Defining a Healthy Microbiome of the Built Environment

Abstract Built structures host complex and dynamic microbial communities whose assembly is shaped by occupancy, ventilation, building materials, cleaning practices, connections to outdoor environments, and other factors. These communities, collectively described as the microbiome of the built environment (MoBE), are increasingly recognized as critical to human health, yet there is currently no consensus definition of what constitutes a healthy MoBE. This gap impedes the development of engineering efforts to balance microbial diversity and immune support with the minimization of infectious disease risks. We propose three pillars that together define a healthy MoBE: (i) pathogens below context-specific risk thresholds; (ii) non-sterility, as sterility is likely to be suboptimal for human health in most contexts; and (iii) resilient diversity, as more diverse communities may resist pathogen colonization and recover more rapidly from perturbations. We synthesize evidence for each pillar, propose a framework for feedback-controlled MoBE engineering, and discuss how pillar priorities should be weighted across building types and occupant populations. We identify critical research priorities to advance actionable performance standards in support of healthy buildings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c05870
Primary Topic
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Defining a Healthy Microbiome of the Built Environment

Claudia K. Gunsch, Joe Brown
Environmental Science & Technology
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
article

Defining a Healthy Microbiome of the Built Environment

Claudia K. Gunsch, Joe Brown
article en

Abstract

Abstract Built structures host complex and dynamic microbial communities whose assembly is shaped by occupancy, ventilation, building materials, cleaning practices, connections to outdoor environments, and other factors. These communities, collectively described as the microbiome of the built environment (MoBE), are increasingly recognized as critical to human health, yet there is currently no consensus definition of what constitutes a healthy MoBE. This gap impedes the development of engineering efforts to balance microbial diversity and immune support with the minimization of infectious disease risks. We propose three pillars that together define a healthy MoBE: (i) pathogens below context-specific risk thresholds; (ii) non-sterility, as sterility is likely to be suboptimal for human health in most contexts; and (iii) resilient diversity, as more diverse communities may resist pathogen colonization and recover more rapidly from perturbations. We synthesize evidence for each pillar, propose a framework for feedback-controlled MoBE engineering, and discuss how pillar priorities should be weighted across building types and occupant populations. We identify critical research priorities to advance actionable performance standards in support of healthy buildings.

Environmental Science & Technology
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Duke University (US), Duke Energy (United States) (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defining a Healthy Microbiome of the Built Environment — Claudia K. Gunsch, Joe Brown · Environmental Science & Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS