What’s next in sepsis? Controversies and future directions from the 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines (SSC) provide evidence-based recommendations for sepsis care relevant to a global audience. While many of the recommendations in the 2026 SSC build upon those in previous iterations, some recommendations point to new directions in the care of patients with sepsis - one characterized by a more flexible approach to the assessment and treatment of individual patient with careful consideration of the benefit of critical care and post-ICU recovery interventions. In this paper, we identify some of these key changes and how modern sepsis practice is changing- a hybrid approach of empiric early treatment alongside a nuanced, personalized stream of care, informed by patient values and preferences. We emphasize key methodological points which inform potentially controversial recommendations, so clinicians may better understand how to implement these in practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.17398
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

What’s next in sepsis? Controversies and future directions from the 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines

Kimia Honarmand, Fayez Alshamsi, Simon Oczkowski, Waleed Alhazzani et al.
Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

What’s next in sepsis? Controversies and future directions from the 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines

Kimia Honarmand, Fayez Alshamsi, Simon Oczkowski, Waleed Alhazzani, Joanna Dionne, Emilie Belley-Cote, Bram Rochwerg, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Morton Hylander Møller, Roman Jaeschke
article en

Abstract

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines (SSC) provide evidence-based recommendations for sepsis care relevant to a global audience. While many of the recommendations in the 2026 SSC build upon those in previous iterations, some recommendations point to new directions in the care of patients with sepsis - one characterized by a more flexible approach to the assessment and treatment of individual patient with careful consideration of the benefit of critical care and post-ICU recovery interventions. In this paper, we identify some of these key changes and how modern sepsis practice is changing- a hybrid approach of empiric early treatment alongside a nuanced, personalized stream of care, informed by patient values and preferences. We emphasize key methodological points which inform potentially controversial recommendations, so clinicians may better understand how to implement these in practice.

Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What’s next in sepsis? Controversies and future directions from the 2026 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines — Kimia Honarmand, Fayez Alshamsi, et al. · Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS