Native and non-native ambrosia beetles compete for deadwood resources

Abstract A consequence of biological invasion is competition between native and non-native species. Ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae, Platypodinae) are among the most successful insect invaders, but their impact in natural settings is poorly understood. Across the United States, non-native ambrosia beetles numerically dominate their native counterparts, creating concern of competitive displacement. We compile one new and three published datasets to test for competition between native and non-native ambrosia beetles within their breeding resources. For each dataset, deadwood objects were created in the field, left to be naturally colonized by insects and then sampled for emergent insects using identical methods. Within 356 objects, native and non-native ambrosia beetles preferentially inhabited the same resources in space and time. Within 141 inhabited objects, native ambrosia beetle abundance declined with increasing abundance of non-natives (and vice versa). Furthermore, the probability of an emerging beetle being native was impacted by wood properties. Thus, we find that native and non-native ambrosia beetles compete, most likely in an exploitative manner, and that certain conditions provide competitive advantages for both groups. Given the importance of ambrosia beetles in forest ecosystem processes, further research is needed to understand the consequences of ambrosia beetle invasion in natural settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2026.1825
Primary Topic
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Native and non-native ambrosia beetles compete for deadwood resources

Michael D. Ulyshen, Clayton R. Traylor, Scott Horn, David R. Coyle
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
article

Native and non-native ambrosia beetles compete for deadwood resources

Michael D. Ulyshen, Clayton R. Traylor, Scott Horn, David R. Coyle
article en

Abstract

Abstract A consequence of biological invasion is competition between native and non-native species. Ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae, Platypodinae) are among the most successful insect invaders, but their impact in natural settings is poorly understood. Across the United States, non-native ambrosia beetles numerically dominate their native counterparts, creating concern of competitive displacement. We compile one new and three published datasets to test for competition between native and non-native ambrosia beetles within their breeding resources. For each dataset, deadwood objects were created in the field, left to be naturally colonized by insects and then sampled for emergent insects using identical methods. Within 356 objects, native and non-native ambrosia beetles preferentially inhabited the same resources in space and time. Within 141 inhabited objects, native ambrosia beetle abundance declined with increasing abundance of non-natives (and vice versa). Furthermore, the probability of an emerging beetle being native was impacted by wood properties. Thus, we find that native and non-native ambrosia beetles compete, most likely in an exploitative manner, and that certain conditions provide competitive advantages for both groups. Given the importance of ambrosia beetles in forest ecosystem processes, further research is needed to understand the consequences of ambrosia beetle invasion in natural settings.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 293(2079)
Southern Research Station (US), Clemson University (US), Temple University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Native and non-native ambrosia beetles compete for deadwood resources — Michael D. Ulyshen, Clayton R. Traylor, et al. · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS