Cardiovascular effects of transcutaneous spinal stimulation in persons living with and without spinal cord injury

Abstract Study design Case-control series. Objectives To investigate the cardiovascular effects of transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) during orthostatic challenge in persons with and without spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting Laboratory. Methods Eleven persons with cervical SCI and ten persons without SCI participated in this study. Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) were measured during an orthostatic challenge (10 min horizontal, 10 min upright). This was repeated with TSS (cathode: T7/T8 or T11/T12) applied when upright, and subsequently for 2 min when horizontal. SBP and HR were compared across groups and experimental conditions with linear mixed models. Results When upright without TSS, SBP increased in the non-SCI group but decreased in the SCI group (mean difference −19.8 mmHg [95% CI, −33.6 to −6.0]). When upright with TSS, SBP increased in the SCI group, similar to non-SCI group (T7/T8: −6.6 mmHg [−20.4 to 7.3], T11/T12: 2.5 mmHg [−11.3 to 16.3]; non-SCI – SCI). In participants with SCI and orthostatic hypotension (OH), TSS at T11/T12 limited the orthostatic drop by 25.8 mmHg [5.0 to 46.6]. When horizontal, TSS increased SBP in the SCI group (T7/T8: 24.7 mmHg [16.8 to 32.6], T11/T12: 27.2 mmHg [19.3 to 35.1]). Conclusion Spinal stimulation at T11/T12 improved OH in persons with SCI. However, it also increases SBP when applied in a horizontal position, a caution for its clinical use. Future studies in people with SCI should explore the potential mechanisms responsible for these TSS-induced SBP effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spinal Cord
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-026-01270-6
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cardiovascular effects of transcutaneous spinal stimulation in persons living with and without spinal cord injury

Billy L. Luu, Martin E. Héroux, Jane E. Butler, Terry Trinh et al.
Spinal Cord
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Cardiovascular effects of transcutaneous spinal stimulation in persons living with and without spinal cord injury

Billy L. Luu, Martin E. Héroux, Jane E. Butler, Terry Trinh, Simon C. Gandevia, Peter Sturgess, Chiettha Prajnadewie
article en

Abstract

Abstract Study design Case-control series. Objectives To investigate the cardiovascular effects of transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) during orthostatic challenge in persons with and without spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting Laboratory. Methods Eleven persons with cervical SCI and ten persons without SCI participated in this study. Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) were measured during an orthostatic challenge (10 min horizontal, 10 min upright). This was repeated with TSS (cathode: T7/T8 or T11/T12) applied when upright, and subsequently for 2 min when horizontal. SBP and HR were compared across groups and experimental conditions with linear mixed models. Results When upright without TSS, SBP increased in the non-SCI group but decreased in the SCI group (mean difference −19.8 mmHg [95% CI, −33.6 to −6.0]). When upright with TSS, SBP increased in the SCI group, similar to non-SCI group (T7/T8: −6.6 mmHg [−20.4 to 7.3], T11/T12: 2.5 mmHg [−11.3 to 16.3]; non-SCI – SCI). In participants with SCI and orthostatic hypotension (OH), TSS at T11/T12 limited the orthostatic drop by 25.8 mmHg [5.0 to 46.6]. When horizontal, TSS increased SBP in the SCI group (T7/T8: 24.7 mmHg [16.8 to 32.6], T11/T12: 27.2 mmHg [19.3 to 35.1]). Conclusion Spinal stimulation at T11/T12 improved OH in persons with SCI. However, it also increases SBP when applied in a horizontal position, a caution for its clinical use. Future studies in people with SCI should explore the potential mechanisms responsible for these TSS-induced SBP effects.

Spinal Cord
The University of Sydney (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Prince of Wales Hospital (AU), Neuroscience Research Australia (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.