Assessing healthcare organizational readiness to implement risk-stratified breast cancer screening in Canada: A cross-sectional questionnaire study

Abstract Background: Organizational readiness for change is a critical precursor of successful implementation of evidence-based practices. This study assessed the readiness of Canadian healthcare organizations to implement risk-stratified breast cancer screening (RSBS). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study with healthcare professionals involved in delivering/administrating breast screening programs, and policymakers in Canada. Organizational readiness was assessed using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) scale (comprising change commitment (CC) and change efficacy (CE)) subscales. Change valence (CV), a determinant of organizational readiness was also assessed using Shea et al’s change valence scale. All items used 5-point Likert scales (1=Disagree to 5=Agree). Results: Of the 338 participants who attempted the questionnaire, 237 fully completed it. Median (IQR) scores, where higher scores indicate greater agreement with the statements suggesting greater perceived organizational readiness, were: ORIC 3.50 (3.00–4.25), CC 3.50 (3.00–4.50), CE 3.40 (3.00–4.20), CV 4.00 (3.50–4.60). Readiness ranged from “uncertain” to “somewhat ready” with no significant differences across interest-holder levels. A gap between value and capacity was evident: 87% agreed RSBS aligned with their organizational values, but only 42–50% felt confident in their organizations management of politics or supporting staff. Agreement that RSBS “makes sense” was associated with higher perceived readiness and change valence (all p≤0.002). Conclusions: Healthcare professionals perceived their organizations as somewhat valuing RSBS but less certain about commitment and capacity to deliver it. Strengthening readiness would require visible leadership, positioning of RSBS as an organizational priority, and enhanced capacity to manage politics, support staff, sustain momentum, and monitor progress. These findings highlight the opportunity and need to proactively build readiness to enhance implementation and strengthen the empirical evidence on how readiness influences RSBS adoption. Keywords: Implementation science; risk-stratified screening; breast cancer; organizational readiness

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo
Published
2026-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.134419
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessing healthcare organizational readiness to implement risk-stratified breast cancer screening in Canada: A cross-sectional questionnaire study

Anna M. Chiarelli, Arian Omeranovic, Nora Pashayan, Annie Turgeon et al.
Apollo
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Assessing healthcare organizational readiness to implement risk-stratified breast cancer screening in Canada: A cross-sectional questionnaire study

Anna M. Chiarelli, Arian Omeranovic, Nora Pashayan, Annie Turgeon, Hermann Nabi, Jacques Simard, Johanne Lessard, Laurence Lambert-Côté, Julie Lapointe, Jocelyne Chiquette, Nareh Safieh Garabedian, Kristina M Blackmore, Penny Soucy, Meghan Walker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Organizational readiness for change is a critical precursor of successful implementation of evidence-based practices. This study assessed the readiness of Canadian healthcare organizations to implement risk-stratified breast cancer screening (RSBS). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study with healthcare professionals involved in delivering/administrating breast screening programs, and policymakers in Canada. Organizational readiness was assessed using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) scale (comprising change commitment (CC) and change efficacy (CE)) subscales. Change valence (CV), a determinant of organizational readiness was also assessed using Shea et al’s change valence scale. All items used 5-point Likert scales (1=Disagree to 5=Agree). Results: Of the 338 participants who attempted the questionnaire, 237 fully completed it. Median (IQR) scores, where higher scores indicate greater agreement with the statements suggesting greater perceived organizational readiness, were: ORIC 3.50 (3.00–4.25), CC 3.50 (3.00–4.50), CE 3.40 (3.00–4.20), CV 4.00 (3.50–4.60). Readiness ranged from “uncertain” to “somewhat ready” with no significant differences across interest-holder levels. A gap between value and capacity was evident: 87% agreed RSBS aligned with their organizational values, but only 42–50% felt confident in their organizations management of politics or supporting staff. Agreement that RSBS “makes sense” was associated with higher perceived readiness and change valence (all p≤0.002). Conclusions: Healthcare professionals perceived their organizations as somewhat valuing RSBS but less certain about commitment and capacity to deliver it. Strengthening readiness would require visible leadership, positioning of RSBS as an organizational priority, and enhanced capacity to manage politics, support staff, sustain momentum, and monitor progress. These findings highlight the opportunity and need to proactively build readiness to enhance implementation and strengthen the empirical evidence on how readiness influences RSBS adoption. Keywords: Implementation science; risk-stratified screening; breast cancer; organizational readiness

Apollo
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.