Time to final drain removal after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective single-centre cohort study

Drain duration varies across breast operations, while reconstruction, axillary surgery, and clinical selection frequently overlap. We quantified time to final drain removal across mastectomy procedures with or without immediate reconstruction and examined whether associations persisted among patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). This retrospective single-centre cohort included 220 patients treated between 2020 and 2025: simple mastectomy (SM, n = 40), modified radical mastectomy (MRM, n = 106), implant reconstruction (IR, n = 32), and latissimus dorsi (LD) flap reconstruction ( n = 42). Final axillary management was coded as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only or ALND; completion ALND after a positive SLNB was classified as ALND. The primary outcome was time to final drain removal; removal after postoperative day 14 was secondary. Adjusted linear and logistic models and an ALND-restricted analysis were performed. Median times were 10 (IQR 9–12), 10 (9–12), 12 (10–15), and 15 (10–20) days for SM, MRM, IR, and LD, respectively ( p < 0.001). In the adjusted continuous model, LD was associated with 3.23 additional days (95% CI 1.11–5.36; p = 0.003); the IR estimate was 0.56 days (95% CI -1.16 to 2.28; p = 0.522). For removal after day 14, LD was associated with higher odds (OR 5.66, 95% CI 2.35–13.65; p < 0.001), whereas IR was not statistically significant (OR 1.97, 95% CI 0.75–5.17; p = 0.170). Among 164 ALND patients, LD remained associated with removal after day 14 (OR 6.25, 95% CI 2.17–18.00; p < 0.001), whereas IR did not. LD reconstruction was associated with longer time to final drain removal, including among ALND patients. The magnitude may support preoperative counselling and drain planning. Because the LD endpoint included donor-site drains and procedure groups reflected non-random clinical selection and patient preference, findings are descriptive associations. Non-significant estimates for ALND, BMI, and clinical stage do not establish absence of effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-04212-4
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Time to final drain removal after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective single-centre cohort study

Murathan Erkent, Afig Gojayev, Samra Kamilova, Ahmet Cakcak et al.
BMC Surgery
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Time to final drain removal after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective single-centre cohort study

Murathan Erkent, Afig Gojayev, Samra Kamilova, Ahmet Cakcak, Sedat Yıldırım, Munis Baghırlı
article en

Abstract

Drain duration varies across breast operations, while reconstruction, axillary surgery, and clinical selection frequently overlap. We quantified time to final drain removal across mastectomy procedures with or without immediate reconstruction and examined whether associations persisted among patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). This retrospective single-centre cohort included 220 patients treated between 2020 and 2025: simple mastectomy (SM, n = 40), modified radical mastectomy (MRM, n = 106), implant reconstruction (IR, n = 32), and latissimus dorsi (LD) flap reconstruction ( n = 42). Final axillary management was coded as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only or ALND; completion ALND after a positive SLNB was classified as ALND. The primary outcome was time to final drain removal; removal after postoperative day 14 was secondary. Adjusted linear and logistic models and an ALND-restricted analysis were performed. Median times were 10 (IQR 9–12), 10 (9–12), 12 (10–15), and 15 (10–20) days for SM, MRM, IR, and LD, respectively ( p < 0.001). In the adjusted continuous model, LD was associated with 3.23 additional days (95% CI 1.11–5.36; p = 0.003); the IR estimate was 0.56 days (95% CI -1.16 to 2.28; p = 0.522). For removal after day 14, LD was associated with higher odds (OR 5.66, 95% CI 2.35–13.65; p < 0.001), whereas IR was not statistically significant (OR 1.97, 95% CI 0.75–5.17; p = 0.170). Among 164 ALND patients, LD remained associated with removal after day 14 (OR 6.25, 95% CI 2.17–18.00; p < 0.001), whereas IR did not. LD reconstruction was associated with longer time to final drain removal, including among ALND patients. The magnitude may support preoperative counselling and drain planning. Because the LD endpoint included donor-site drains and procedure groups reflected non-random clinical selection and patient preference, findings are descriptive associations. Non-significant estimates for ALND, BMI, and clinical stage do not establish absence of effect.

BMC Surgery
Başkent University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.