The Evolution of Committee Agenda Control in the Antebellum U.S. House of Representatives

Gatekeeping is viewed as an essential element of committee power in the U.S. Congress, but its emergence is not well understood. The House of Representatives moved to a system of standing committees by 1825. We investigated whether that move gave committees gatekeeping power prior to the Civil War or layered committees atop the earlier Jeffersonian system centering consequential legislative action on the floor. Using original data from the House Journal , we find evidence of institutional layering, with elements of gatekeeping – jurisdictional clarity, positive agenda setting, and negative agenda setting – developing unevenly and largely through changes in the behavior of members rather than formal reform of the House to empower its committees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Research Quarterly
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261486873
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Evolution of Committee Agenda Control in the Antebellum U.S. House of Representatives

Chris Den Hartog, John J. Baughman, Craig Goodman
Political Research Quarterly
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

The Evolution of Committee Agenda Control in the Antebellum U.S. House of Representatives

Chris Den Hartog, John J. Baughman, Craig Goodman
article en

Abstract

Gatekeeping is viewed as an essential element of committee power in the U.S. Congress, but its emergence is not well understood. The House of Representatives moved to a system of standing committees by 1825. We investigated whether that move gave committees gatekeeping power prior to the Civil War or layered committees atop the earlier Jeffersonian system centering consequential legislative action on the floor. Using original data from the House Journal , we find evidence of institutional layering, with elements of gatekeeping – jurisdictional clarity, positive agenda setting, and negative agenda setting – developing unevenly and largely through changes in the behavior of members rather than formal reform of the House to empower its committees.

Political Research Quarterly
California Polytechnic State University (US), Texas A&M University-Victoria (US), Bates College (US), Cal Poly Corporation (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Evolution of Committee Agenda Control in the Antebellum U.S. House of Representatives — Chris Den Hartog, John J. Baughman, et al. · Political Research Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS