Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study of Continuous Antibiotic Infusion via Peripheral Intravenous Cannula in the Hospital in the Home Setting

Importance Continuous intravenous (IV) antibiotic infusion via peripheral intravenous cannula (PIVC) is utilised in some Hospital in the Home (HITH) services, but current Australian guidelines advise against this practice due to concerns about device failure and complication risk. Objective To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and patient experience of continuous IV antibiotic therapy delivered via PIVC in Australian HITH services. Design Multicentre prospective observational cohort study. Setting Four Australian hospitals with established HITH services. Participants Adults (≥18 years) receiving anticipated short-term (<14 days) continuous IV antibiotic infusion via PIVC. Patients with central or midline catheters, intermittent dosing, or <12-hour infusions were excluded. Exposure Continuous 12–24 hour IV antibiotic administration using an elastomeric pump. Outcomes Primary outcomes were the frequency and reasons for PIVC failure (unplanned removal due to complication). Secondary outcomes included complication types, predictors of failure, PIVC dwell time, guideline adherence, and patient satisfaction. Results 309 patients were included (461 PIVCs; 1,776 catheter-days). Overall PIVC failure rate was 9.98% (46/461; 95% CI 7.40–13.09%), or 25.901 failures per 1,000 catheter-days. No PIVC-related bacteraemia or local infection occurred. Dislodgement (2.82%), phlebitis and pain (each 2.39%) were the most common causes of failure. Higher final Visual Infusion Phlebitis (VIP) score predicted failure (OR 1.89 per point; 95% CI 1.06–3.18; p=0.018). Charlson Comorbidity Index was the only independent predictor of failure (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02–1.56; p=0.030). Clinically indicated PIVC replacement was associated with a reduced PIVC failure rate (IRR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13-0.48; p<0.001). Patient satisfaction was high (mean 9.6/10). Conclusion Continuous PIVC antibiotic infusion in HITH is safe, effective, and associated with excellent patient experience. The findings support clinically indicated PIVC replacement guided by VIP score assessment and may inform guideline updates for short-course therapy in HITH settings. Trial Registration: ACTRN12625000384459

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Home Medicine
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64919/001c.169067
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study of Continuous Antibiotic Infusion via Peripheral Intravenous Cannula in the Hospital in the Home Setting

Karyn Cuthbert, Barbara Lee, Bin Ong, Vincent Ngian
Journal of Advanced Home Medicine
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study of Continuous Antibiotic Infusion via Peripheral Intravenous Cannula in the Hospital in the Home Setting

Karyn Cuthbert, Barbara Lee, Bin Ong, Vincent Ngian
article en

Abstract

Importance Continuous intravenous (IV) antibiotic infusion via peripheral intravenous cannula (PIVC) is utilised in some Hospital in the Home (HITH) services, but current Australian guidelines advise against this practice due to concerns about device failure and complication risk. Objective To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and patient experience of continuous IV antibiotic therapy delivered via PIVC in Australian HITH services. Design Multicentre prospective observational cohort study. Setting Four Australian hospitals with established HITH services. Participants Adults (≥18 years) receiving anticipated short-term (<14 days) continuous IV antibiotic infusion via PIVC. Patients with central or midline catheters, intermittent dosing, or <12-hour infusions were excluded. Exposure Continuous 12–24 hour IV antibiotic administration using an elastomeric pump. Outcomes Primary outcomes were the frequency and reasons for PIVC failure (unplanned removal due to complication). Secondary outcomes included complication types, predictors of failure, PIVC dwell time, guideline adherence, and patient satisfaction. Results 309 patients were included (461 PIVCs; 1,776 catheter-days). Overall PIVC failure rate was 9.98% (46/461; 95% CI 7.40–13.09%), or 25.901 failures per 1,000 catheter-days. No PIVC-related bacteraemia or local infection occurred. Dislodgement (2.82%), phlebitis and pain (each 2.39%) were the most common causes of failure. Higher final Visual Infusion Phlebitis (VIP) score predicted failure (OR 1.89 per point; 95% CI 1.06–3.18; p=0.018). Charlson Comorbidity Index was the only independent predictor of failure (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02–1.56; p=0.030). Clinically indicated PIVC replacement was associated with a reduced PIVC failure rate (IRR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13-0.48; p<0.001). Patient satisfaction was high (mean 9.6/10). Conclusion Continuous PIVC antibiotic infusion in HITH is safe, effective, and associated with excellent patient experience. The findings support clinically indicated PIVC replacement guided by VIP score assessment and may inform guideline updates for short-course therapy in HITH settings. Trial Registration: ACTRN12625000384459

Journal of Advanced Home MedicineVol. 1(2)
Australian National University (AU), Bankstown Lidcombe Hospital (AU), Canberra Hospital (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.