Insertion of a Postoperative Drain After Surgeries for Intracranial Abscesses or Empyemas—A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Introduction: The routine insertion of a postoperative intracranial drain following surgical evacuation of brain abscesses or subdural empyemas is practiced by some surgeons to facilitate pus evacuation and to enable cavity lavage, but robust evidence for clinical benefit is lacking. This study evaluates whether postoperative drain placement affects reoperation rates, length of hospital stay, and duration of antibiotic therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive adult patients who underwent surgical drainage or excision of a primary intracranial abscess or empyema at our tertiary center between January 2020 and January 2026. Patients were grouped by whether a postoperative intracranial drain was placed. The primary endpoint was recurrence requiring reoperation. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay, total duration of antibiotic therapy, and operative time. Continuous variables were compared with t-tests and categorical variables with Fisher’s exact test; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Eighty procedures were identified, and 36 patients met inclusion criteria for final analysis; eight (22.2%) received a postoperative intracranial drain, and 28 (77.8%) did not. Overall, 13 patients (36.1%) required reoperation for radiological or clinical progression. Reoperation occurred in 50% of patients with a drain and 32.1% without a drain (p = 0.422). Median hospital stay and duration of antibiotic therapy did not differ significantly between groups (median hospital stay 27.1 vs. 23.0 days, p = 0.50; median antibiotic duration 67.3 vs. 51.7 days, p = 0.445). Operative time and infection volume rates were also similar between cohorts. Conclusions: In this single-center retrospective cohort, placement of a postoperative intracranial drain after surgical management of brain abscesses or empyemas was not associated with reduced reoperation rates, shorter hospitalization, or shorter antibiotic treatment. Given the absence of demonstrable clinical benefit and the potential risks related to drain placement, routine insertion of postoperative drains cannot be recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology International
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint18090174
Primary Topic
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Insertion of a Postoperative Drain After Surgeries for Intracranial Abscesses or Empyemas—A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Mohammed Banat, Haitham Alenezi, Tim Lampmann, Harun Asoglu et al.
Neurology International
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
article

Insertion of a Postoperative Drain After Surgeries for Intracranial Abscesses or Empyemas—A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Mohammed Banat, Haitham Alenezi, Tim Lampmann, Harun Asoglu, Motaz Hamed, Saif-Eldin Abedellatif, Mohammed Jaber, Hartmut Vatter
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The routine insertion of a postoperative intracranial drain following surgical evacuation of brain abscesses or subdural empyemas is practiced by some surgeons to facilitate pus evacuation and to enable cavity lavage, but robust evidence for clinical benefit is lacking. This study evaluates whether postoperative drain placement affects reoperation rates, length of hospital stay, and duration of antibiotic therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive adult patients who underwent surgical drainage or excision of a primary intracranial abscess or empyema at our tertiary center between January 2020 and January 2026. Patients were grouped by whether a postoperative intracranial drain was placed. The primary endpoint was recurrence requiring reoperation. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay, total duration of antibiotic therapy, and operative time. Continuous variables were compared with t-tests and categorical variables with Fisher’s exact test; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Eighty procedures were identified, and 36 patients met inclusion criteria for final analysis; eight (22.2%) received a postoperative intracranial drain, and 28 (77.8%) did not. Overall, 13 patients (36.1%) required reoperation for radiological or clinical progression. Reoperation occurred in 50% of patients with a drain and 32.1% without a drain (p = 0.422). Median hospital stay and duration of antibiotic therapy did not differ significantly between groups (median hospital stay 27.1 vs. 23.0 days, p = 0.50; median antibiotic duration 67.3 vs. 51.7 days, p = 0.445). Operative time and infection volume rates were also similar between cohorts. Conclusions: In this single-center retrospective cohort, placement of a postoperative intracranial drain after surgical management of brain abscesses or empyemas was not associated with reduced reoperation rates, shorter hospitalization, or shorter antibiotic treatment. Given the absence of demonstrable clinical benefit and the potential risks related to drain placement, routine insertion of postoperative drains cannot be recommended.

Neurology InternationalVol. 18(9)
University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.