Automated measurement of Little’s Irregularity Index on intraoral photographs using a convolutional neural network

BACKGROUND: Quantification of dental irregularities is essential for assessing case severity, evaluating treatment outcomes, and aiding early detection of fixed retainer failure. Measurements are typically performed on casts or digital scans, although manual measurement on intraoral photographs has been explored to enable remote monitoring. This study evaluated automated measurement of mandibular anterior irregularity on intraoral photographs using a deep learning model. METHODS: A dataset of intraoral occlusal photographs annotated with contact points of mandibular anterior teeth was created to train a neural network model. Individual tooth displacements and Little's Irregularity Index (LII) were computed from these contact points. Annotation reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, and agreement between model-derived and reference LII measurements was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis on an independent test set. A supplementary, exploratory Bland-Altman analysis was performed at the tooth level. An a priori power analysis determined the required size of the test set, based on a predefined equivalence threshold of 2 mm for LII. RESULTS: The model demonstrated precise localisation of contact points, with a mean radial error of 0.55 ± 0.22 mm. Tooth displacement and LII were predicted with mean absolute errors of 0.42 ± 0.32 mm and 1.37 ± 0.89 mm, respectively. For LII, Bland-Altman analysis revealed a significant bias of 1.07 mm, with limits of agreement ranging from -1.36 mm to 3.50 mm. The exploratory tooth-level analysis yielded a bias of 0.21 mm and descriptive limits of agreement ranging from -0.74 mm to 1.17 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The neural network enables automated detection of mandibular anterior landmarks and estimation of LII from intraoral photographs. Since the limits of agreement were wider than the predefined equivalence threshold, the proposed model can currently only be recommended as a complementary tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09870-7
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Automated measurement of Little’s Irregularity Index on intraoral photographs using a convolutional neural network

Claudius Middelberg, Thomas Stamm, Moritz Kanemeier, Jonas Q. Schmid et al.
BMC Oral Health
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Automated measurement of Little’s Irregularity Index on intraoral photographs using a convolutional neural network

Claudius Middelberg, Thomas Stamm, Moritz Kanemeier, Jonas Q. Schmid, Tuna Ergün
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantification of dental irregularities is essential for assessing case severity, evaluating treatment outcomes, and aiding early detection of fixed retainer failure. Measurements are typically performed on casts or digital scans, although manual measurement on intraoral photographs has been explored to enable remote monitoring. This study evaluated automated measurement of mandibular anterior irregularity on intraoral photographs using a deep learning model. METHODS: A dataset of intraoral occlusal photographs annotated with contact points of mandibular anterior teeth was created to train a neural network model. Individual tooth displacements and Little's Irregularity Index (LII) were computed from these contact points. Annotation reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, and agreement between model-derived and reference LII measurements was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis on an independent test set. A supplementary, exploratory Bland-Altman analysis was performed at the tooth level. An a priori power analysis determined the required size of the test set, based on a predefined equivalence threshold of 2 mm for LII. RESULTS: The model demonstrated precise localisation of contact points, with a mean radial error of 0.55 ± 0.22 mm. Tooth displacement and LII were predicted with mean absolute errors of 0.42 ± 0.32 mm and 1.37 ± 0.89 mm, respectively. For LII, Bland-Altman analysis revealed a significant bias of 1.07 mm, with limits of agreement ranging from -1.36 mm to 3.50 mm. The exploratory tooth-level analysis yielded a bias of 0.21 mm and descriptive limits of agreement ranging from -0.74 mm to 1.17 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The neural network enables automated detection of mandibular anterior landmarks and estimation of LII from intraoral photographs. Since the limits of agreement were wider than the predefined equivalence threshold, the proposed model can currently only be recommended as a complementary tool.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
University of Münster (DE), University Hospital Münster (DE)
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.