Spokane regional health district workplace mental health and well-being assessment

Public health agencies protect and promote population health under conditions of chronic underfunding, political scrutiny, and high demand, creating a distinct set of stressors for their workforce; yet the mental health and well-being of the local governmental public health workforce remain less well characterized at the level of individual agencies, where actionable, domain-specific data are needed to guide organizational response. This study aimed to understand the workplace mental health and well-being (WP-MH&WB) of employees at the Spokane Regional Health District (SRHD), a local public health agency in Washington State. An online WP-MH&WB survey (the Augusta+ Scale) was distributed to SRHD employees in August and September 2025. A mixed-methods approach was adopted to analyze the data. A total of 216 employees responded to the survey, of whom 179 completed it. The average WP-MH&WB score was 83.4 ± 20.7 (score range: 22–110). Overall, 44.3% of respondents reported experiencing burnout, while 57.8% reported experiencing loneliness. Respondents reporting burnout scored about 23 points lower on the WP-MH&WB scale than those who did not; this difference was similar across age, gender, race, division, and work arrangement, with no significant interactions after adjustment for multiple testing. Logistic regression analysis revealed that a unit increase in the WP-MH&WB scale score was associated with an 8% decrease in odds of experiencing burnout (OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.89–0.95; p < 0.001). WP-MH&WB gaps varied across SRHD divisions, with the largest deficits in career advancement and workplace mattering, underscoring the need for targeted, domain-specific intervention. Applying a validated, framework-anchored instrument at the division level offers a replicable approach other local health agencies can use to identify and prioritize their own areas of greatest need.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-29509-0
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Spokane regional health district workplace mental health and well-being assessment

Neil J. MacKinnon, Caleb Zimmerman, Christya N. Haddad, Paige S. Weid et al.
BMC Public Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Spokane regional health district workplace mental health and well-being assessment

Neil J. MacKinnon, Caleb Zimmerman, Christya N. Haddad, Paige S. Weid, Preshit N. Ambade
article en

Abstract

Public health agencies protect and promote population health under conditions of chronic underfunding, political scrutiny, and high demand, creating a distinct set of stressors for their workforce; yet the mental health and well-being of the local governmental public health workforce remain less well characterized at the level of individual agencies, where actionable, domain-specific data are needed to guide organizational response. This study aimed to understand the workplace mental health and well-being (WP-MH&WB) of employees at the Spokane Regional Health District (SRHD), a local public health agency in Washington State. An online WP-MH&WB survey (the Augusta+ Scale) was distributed to SRHD employees in August and September 2025. A mixed-methods approach was adopted to analyze the data. A total of 216 employees responded to the survey, of whom 179 completed it. The average WP-MH&WB score was 83.4 ± 20.7 (score range: 22–110). Overall, 44.3% of respondents reported experiencing burnout, while 57.8% reported experiencing loneliness. Respondents reporting burnout scored about 23 points lower on the WP-MH&WB scale than those who did not; this difference was similar across age, gender, race, division, and work arrangement, with no significant interactions after adjustment for multiple testing. Logistic regression analysis revealed that a unit increase in the WP-MH&WB scale score was associated with an 8% decrease in odds of experiencing burnout (OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.89–0.95; p < 0.001). WP-MH&WB gaps varied across SRHD divisions, with the largest deficits in career advancement and workplace mattering, underscoring the need for targeted, domain-specific intervention. Applying a validated, framework-anchored instrument at the division level offers a replicable approach other local health agencies can use to identify and prioritize their own areas of greatest need.

BMC Public Health
Central Michigan University (US), The Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.