Institutional Volume Explains Observed Facility-Level Differences in Survival Following Surgical Resection of Spinal Schwannomas: A National Cancer Database Study

Introduction Spinal schwannomas are benign tumors that comprise over 20% of primary intraspinal neoplasms. While gross total resection offers excellent local control, little is known about how facility-level factors correlate with survival. This study evaluated patient and institutional characteristics associated with outcomes in spinal schwannoma surgery. Methods Data were obtained from the National Cancer Database for patients diagnosed with spinal schwannoma. Analyses were performed for the overall cohort and for the subset of patients who underwent surgical resection. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Differences in patient characteristics across facility types were assessed using standard comparative statistics. Results Our study included 20,961 patients with spinal schwannomas, of whom 4547 (21.7%) underwent surgical resection. Academic centers treated the largest share of patients (11,735, 56.0%), followed by comprehensive community (5015, 23.9%), integrated network (3824, 18.2%), and community programs (387, 1.85%). In the overall cohort, survival did not differ by facility type. Among surgically treated patients, care at an academic facility was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.16, P < 0.001). However, following adjustment for institutional surgical volume, facility designation was no longer independently associated with survival (academic facility HR=1.21, P = 0.850), while higher institutional surgical volume remained independently associated with improved survival outcomes (HR = 0.998, P = 0.037). Conclusions Our study finds that facility volume was associated with improved survival for surgical schwannoma patients. This finding suggests potential benefits of centralizing spinal schwannoma care to high-volume centers and underscores the need for further study of referral patterns and operative outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgical Research
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2026.08.022
Primary Topic
Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Institutional Volume Explains Observed Facility-Level Differences in Survival Following Surgical Resection of Spinal Schwannomas: A National Cancer Database Study

Jeffrey Lubisich, Emanuel Eguia, Jacqueline Kieu, Noah Laurey et al.
Journal of Surgical Research
Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
article

Institutional Volume Explains Observed Facility-Level Differences in Survival Following Surgical Resection of Spinal Schwannomas: A National Cancer Database Study

Jeffrey Lubisich, Emanuel Eguia, Jacqueline Kieu, Noah Laurey, Andrew Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Introduction Spinal schwannomas are benign tumors that comprise over 20% of primary intraspinal neoplasms. While gross total resection offers excellent local control, little is known about how facility-level factors correlate with survival. This study evaluated patient and institutional characteristics associated with outcomes in spinal schwannoma surgery. Methods Data were obtained from the National Cancer Database for patients diagnosed with spinal schwannoma. Analyses were performed for the overall cohort and for the subset of patients who underwent surgical resection. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Differences in patient characteristics across facility types were assessed using standard comparative statistics. Results Our study included 20,961 patients with spinal schwannomas, of whom 4547 (21.7%) underwent surgical resection. Academic centers treated the largest share of patients (11,735, 56.0%), followed by comprehensive community (5015, 23.9%), integrated network (3824, 18.2%), and community programs (387, 1.85%). In the overall cohort, survival did not differ by facility type. Among surgically treated patients, care at an academic facility was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.16, P < 0.001). However, following adjustment for institutional surgical volume, facility designation was no longer independently associated with survival (academic facility HR=1.21, P = 0.850), while higher institutional surgical volume remained independently associated with improved survival outcomes (HR = 0.998, P = 0.037). Conclusions Our study finds that facility volume was associated with improved survival for surgical schwannoma patients. This finding suggests potential benefits of centralizing spinal schwannoma care to high-volume centers and underscores the need for further study of referral patterns and operative outcomes.

Journal of Surgical ResearchVol. 327
Loma Linda University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutional Volume Explains Observed Facility-Level Differences in Survival Following Surgical Resection of Spinal Schwannomas: A National Cancer Database Study — Jeffrey Lubisich, Emanuel Eguia, et al. · Journal of Surgical Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS