Augmenting Expertise in Organizational Foresight: The Role of GenAI in Collaborative Settings

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the transformative potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in organizational foresight by examining not only whether human−AI collaboration occurs, but how different collaboration designs shape foresight quality. As organizations navigate increasingly complex and uncertain environments, the traditional reliance on human expertise for foresight activities requires re‐evaluation. Drawing on bounded rationality, dual‐process theory, and sensemaking as an integrated set of microfoundations, the paper argues that GenAI roles alter attention, search breadth, and cognitive friction in ways that influence scenario diversity, weak signal detection, assumption surfacing, and strategic recommendation quality. Through a literature review and the application of a 2 × 2 matrix deductive scenarios method, four ideal‐typical roles of GenAI in organizational foresight are identified: Resilience Builder, Ally Insider, Provoking Catalyst, and Critical Outsider. The findings suggest that these roles are best understood as contingent collaboration modes that can be sequenced across different phases of the foresight process, expanding debate on expertise, workflow design, and the conditions under which GenAI strengthens or weakens strategic foresight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Futures & Foresight Science
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.70052
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Augmenting Expertise in Organizational Foresight: The Role of GenAI in Collaborative Settings

Lukas Zumbrunn
Futures & Foresight Science
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Augmenting Expertise in Organizational Foresight: The Role of GenAI in Collaborative Settings

Lukas Zumbrunn
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the transformative potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in organizational foresight by examining not only whether human−AI collaboration occurs, but how different collaboration designs shape foresight quality. As organizations navigate increasingly complex and uncertain environments, the traditional reliance on human expertise for foresight activities requires re‐evaluation. Drawing on bounded rationality, dual‐process theory, and sensemaking as an integrated set of microfoundations, the paper argues that GenAI roles alter attention, search breadth, and cognitive friction in ways that influence scenario diversity, weak signal detection, assumption surfacing, and strategic recommendation quality. Through a literature review and the application of a 2 × 2 matrix deductive scenarios method, four ideal‐typical roles of GenAI in organizational foresight are identified: Resilience Builder, Ally Insider, Provoking Catalyst, and Critical Outsider. The findings suggest that these roles are best understood as contingent collaboration modes that can be sequenced across different phases of the foresight process, expanding debate on expertise, workflow design, and the conditions under which GenAI strengthens or weakens strategic foresight.

Futures & Foresight ScienceVol. 8(3)
University of St.Gallen (CH), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Augmenting Expertise in Organizational Foresight: The Role of GenAI in Collaborative Settings — Lukas Zumbrunn · Futures & Foresight Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS