Exploring the effect of tandem non-native non-F-type lectin carbohydrate-binding domains on Streptosporangium roseum α-L-Fucosidase activity

Microbial carbohydrate-active enzymes often contain non-catalytic carbohydrate-binding modules, which enhance the activity of the catalytic domain by proximity, targeting, or disruptive effects. We have previously biochemically characterized a GH29 α-L-fucosidase from Streptosporangium roseum, demonstrated that its C-terminal F-type lectin domain (FLD) improves the enzyme activity of its tandem N-terminal α-L-fucosidase domain towards fucooligosaccharides, and proposed a “bind and jump” model to explain this FLD-driven improvement of α-L-fucosidase activity. Here, we have explored the use of non-native, non-FLD carbohydrate-binding domains to similarly enhance the enzymatic activity of the α-L-fucosidase domain. We employed three carbohydrate-binding domains (MG1D1, MN3α, and MU1α) that we previously identified from the gut microbial metagenome by functional screening, and fused them to the N-terminus of the S. roseum α-L-fucosidase domain. The constructs showed activity on a synthetic substrate, 4-Methylumbelliferyl-α-L-fucopyranoside. However, when assaying these constructs on the natural fucosylated oligosaccharides, Lewis a tetrasaccharide and 2′-fucosyllactose, we did not observe a statistically significant improvement in the α-L-fucosidase activity of MN3α- Sr Fuc, MG1D1- Sr Fuc, or MU1α- Sr Fuc, compared to the Sr Fuc construct containing only the α-L-fucosidase domain. Our results indicate that the tandem positioning of these non-native, non-FLD carbohydrate-binding domains does not significantly improve the α-L-fucosidase activity of Sr Fuc towards these oligosaccharides. Additional chimeric constructs with domain organizations designed to closely mimic the wild-type protein Sr FucNaFLD, and further studies focused on the mechanistic basis of the FLD-mediated improvement of α-L-fucosidase activity, might help translate the strategy and design chimeric α-L-fucosidases with non-native, non-FLD carbohydrate-binding domains that exhibit improved α-L-fucosidase activity towards these oligosaccharides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2026.102797
Primary Topic
Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Exploring the effect of tandem non-native non-F-type lectin carbohydrate-binding domains on Streptosporangium roseum α-L-Fucosidase activity

T.N.C. Ramya, Madhu Lata, Shivangi, Srikrishna Subramanian
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
article

Exploring the effect of tandem non-native non-F-type lectin carbohydrate-binding domains on Streptosporangium roseum α-L-Fucosidase activity

T.N.C. Ramya, Madhu Lata, Shivangi, Srikrishna Subramanian
article en

Abstract

Microbial carbohydrate-active enzymes often contain non-catalytic carbohydrate-binding modules, which enhance the activity of the catalytic domain by proximity, targeting, or disruptive effects. We have previously biochemically characterized a GH29 α-L-fucosidase from Streptosporangium roseum, demonstrated that its C-terminal F-type lectin domain (FLD) improves the enzyme activity of its tandem N-terminal α-L-fucosidase domain towards fucooligosaccharides, and proposed a “bind and jump” model to explain this FLD-driven improvement of α-L-fucosidase activity. Here, we have explored the use of non-native, non-FLD carbohydrate-binding domains to similarly enhance the enzymatic activity of the α-L-fucosidase domain. We employed three carbohydrate-binding domains (MG1D1, MN3α, and MU1α) that we previously identified from the gut microbial metagenome by functional screening, and fused them to the N-terminus of the S. roseum α-L-fucosidase domain. The constructs showed activity on a synthetic substrate, 4-Methylumbelliferyl-α-L-fucopyranoside. However, when assaying these constructs on the natural fucosylated oligosaccharides, Lewis a tetrasaccharide and 2′-fucosyllactose, we did not observe a statistically significant improvement in the α-L-fucosidase activity of MN3α- Sr Fuc, MG1D1- Sr Fuc, or MU1α- Sr Fuc, compared to the Sr Fuc construct containing only the α-L-fucosidase domain. Our results indicate that the tandem positioning of these non-native, non-FLD carbohydrate-binding domains does not significantly improve the α-L-fucosidase activity of Sr Fuc towards these oligosaccharides. Additional chimeric constructs with domain organizations designed to closely mimic the wild-type protein Sr FucNaFLD, and further studies focused on the mechanistic basis of the FLD-mediated improvement of α-L-fucosidase activity, might help translate the strategy and design chimeric α-L-fucosidases with non-native, non-FLD carbohydrate-binding domains that exhibit improved α-L-fucosidase activity towards these oligosaccharides.

Biochemistry and Biophysics ReportsVol. 48
Institute of Microbial Technology (IN), Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, CSIR - Institute of Microbial Technology
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.