A Qualitative Investigation of Children and Young People’s Experiences of Three Universal Classroom-based Mental Health Literacy Interventions in England

Abstract School-based mental health literacy interventions seek to improve knowledge, reduce stigma, and enhance help-seeking. However, little evidence exists for their effectiveness in the English school setting and there has been limited qualitative research thus far exploring implementation and the core components required to produce positive outcomes. This study aimed to address these gaps in existing research. Ninety-five students aged 8 to 14 years took part in focus groups across 12 schools in England in 2019. Twenty-six had participated in The Mental Health and High School Curriculum Guide (The Guide), 34 in Youth Aware of Mental Health (YAM), and 35 in Strategies for Safety and Wellbeing (SSW), as part of two randomised controlled trials. The focus groups asked students about their experiences of and opinions on the interventions. The data were analysed drawing on reflexive thematic analysis. Participants reported several perceived impacts from the three interventions, including increased knowledge and awareness of mental health difficulties, and new real world problem-solving skills. Although the interventions were perceived to provide a fun, relaxed, and safe space that reduced stress, sometimes participants found the content boring, and certain topics upsetting and anxiety-provoking. Interactive, practical, and discussion-based activities were preferred, and participants wanted more personal and relatable content. Issues such as timetabling and behaviour management were mentioned as barriers to engagement. Ultimately, what was common across all three interventions was that children and young people appreciated the time dedicated to talking about mental health and found the space offered to discuss real world problems novel compared to normal lessons. Schools need to be enabled to create this space within the school day and staff empowered and supported to lead discussions on topics that can be difficult to talk about.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary School Psychology
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-026-00611-9
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Qualitative Investigation of Children and Young People’s Experiences of Three Universal Classroom-based Mental Health Literacy Interventions in England

Jessica Deighton, Emily Stapley, Anna March, Rosie Mansfield et al.
Contemporary School Psychology
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

A Qualitative Investigation of Children and Young People’s Experiences of Three Universal Classroom-based Mental Health Literacy Interventions in England

Jessica Deighton, Emily Stapley, Anna March, Rosie Mansfield, Daniel Hayes, Emma Ashworth, Kim Burrell
article en

Abstract

Abstract School-based mental health literacy interventions seek to improve knowledge, reduce stigma, and enhance help-seeking. However, little evidence exists for their effectiveness in the English school setting and there has been limited qualitative research thus far exploring implementation and the core components required to produce positive outcomes. This study aimed to address these gaps in existing research. Ninety-five students aged 8 to 14 years took part in focus groups across 12 schools in England in 2019. Twenty-six had participated in The Mental Health and High School Curriculum Guide (The Guide), 34 in Youth Aware of Mental Health (YAM), and 35 in Strategies for Safety and Wellbeing (SSW), as part of two randomised controlled trials. The focus groups asked students about their experiences of and opinions on the interventions. The data were analysed drawing on reflexive thematic analysis. Participants reported several perceived impacts from the three interventions, including increased knowledge and awareness of mental health difficulties, and new real world problem-solving skills. Although the interventions were perceived to provide a fun, relaxed, and safe space that reduced stress, sometimes participants found the content boring, and certain topics upsetting and anxiety-provoking. Interactive, practical, and discussion-based activities were preferred, and participants wanted more personal and relatable content. Issues such as timetabling and behaviour management were mentioned as barriers to engagement. Ultimately, what was common across all three interventions was that children and young people appreciated the time dedicated to talking about mental health and found the space offered to discuss real world problems novel compared to normal lessons. Schools need to be enabled to create this space within the school day and staff empowered and supported to lead discussions on topics that can be difficult to talk about.

Contemporary School Psychology
University of Exeter (GB), Anna Freud Centre (GB), Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology (GB), University College London (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), Bedford College (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.